Your submission at Articles for creation: Time Travel Through A Book (August 1) edit

 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Girth Summit was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This book that this draft is about appears to be self-published - it is exceedingly unlikely to meet Wikipedia's notability standards. See WP:NBOOK for more detail on those.
Girth Summit (blether) 12:02, 1 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Rishit.kumar.kundu! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Girth Summit (blether) 12:02, 1 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hi - I am assuming from your username that you are the author of the book. I congratulate you on writing it, and I hope it is successful for you, but Wikipedia isn't a place where you are permitted to promote your own works - see WP:COI for more on this. Best Girth Summit (blether) 12:05, 1 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Time travel through a book (August 5) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 11:09, 5 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Now what to do to make it published? Rishit.kumar.kundu (talk) 03:57, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

  • You appear to have a significant conflict of interest. If you are the author of this book then self promotion is not supported and would lead to the article being deleted and you being banned from editing on Wikipedia. Dan arndt (talk) 05:56, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of TIME TRAVEL THROUGH A BOOK edit

Hello Rishit.kumar.kundu,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Sennecaster, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, TIME TRAVEL THROUGH A BOOK for deletion, because it appears to be about something that you or someone you know personally invented, coined, or discovered, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important and/or recognized enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Sennecaster}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Sennecaster (Chat) 14:50, 12 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of TIME TRAVEL THROUGH A BOOK edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on TIME TRAVEL THROUGH A BOOK, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. – NJD-DE (talk) 17:00, 12 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

August 2022 edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. see WP:SELFPROMONJD-DE (talk) 17:01, 12 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Deb (talk) 17:13, 12 August 2022 (UTC)Reply