Chiisagata (小県郡, Chiisagata-gun) is a district located in Nagano Prefecture, Japan.[1]

Population

As of October 1, 2018, the district has an estimated population of 10,001.[2]

History

Due to the district, ward, town and village status enforcement, the district seat was located at the town of Ueda on January 14, 1879. On April 1, 1889, due to enforcing the town and village status, Chiisagata District formed the towns of Ueda, Nagakuboshin, and Nagakubofuru, and 32 villages (3 towns, 32 villages). The village of Maruko gained town status on October 30, 1912. (4 towns, 31 villages). The town of Ueda gained city status on May 1, 1919 which lasted until March 6, 2006 (3 towns, 31 villages). - (-) The village of Sakashita merged on September 10, 1921 into the city of Ueda (3 towns, 30 villages). On September 1, 1949, the villages of Higashishiota and Fujisan merged to form the village of Higashishiota (3 towns, 29 villages). On October 1, 1953 - The village of Sagata gained town status and changed the name to Tanaka. (4 towns, 28 villages). On April 1, 1954 - (-) The villages of Shiojiri and Kawabe merged into the city of Ueda (4 towns, 26 villages). On October 1, 1954, the villages of Higashiuchi and Nishiuchi merged into the town of Maruko (4 towns, 24 villages). On April 1, 1955, the villages of Yoda and Nagase merged into the town of Maruko (4 towns, 22 villages). On May 1, 1956, the villages of Nishishiota, Bessho, Higashishiota, and Nakashiota merged to form the town of Shiota (5 towns, 18 villages).

References

  1. ^ "Chiisagata district, Nagano, Japan". Retrieved 24 November 2020.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  2. ^ "JAPAN: Administrative Division". Retrieved 24 November 2020.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)

Unblock edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rishabsingh97 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I apologize for my actions of creating too many accounts in Wikipedia. I kept making new accounts because I like editing Wikipedia articles. Yes, I did some mistakes in the past in editing the articles as I was not aware of Wikipedia's guidelines, and that's why my accounts kept getting blocked. I want to tell you that I have now read Wikipedia's rules and guidelines, and I promise I will not create any more accounts in Wikipedia. I also promise that I will edit Wikipedia articles according to its rules and guidelines. I have proposed improvements for the Wikipedia article Chiisagata District, Nagano in my user talk page. Please check those improvements and I kindly request you to unblock me as soon as possible. Thank You. Rishabsingh97 (talk) 04:30, 25 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

As a first step, you should list all the accounts you've used. Some of your accounts claim not to be sock puppets, and here you say they are. Maybe you could clear that up, too. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:07, 25 November 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

A few days ago you asked for an unblock on one of your sock accounts, claiming I do not have other accounts in Wikipedia [1]. Meters (talk) 04:48, 25 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Unblock edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rishabsingh97 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I created my original account so that I could edit some of my favourite articles in Wikipedia. I understand that I violated Wikipedia's rules and guidelines, and that's why the Wikipedia administrator blocked my original account. I ,then, created the other account Rishabsingh.nitt. As I work as a social media manager at an institution, I used the Rishabsingh.nitt account to edit the institution's Wikipedia article. That's why I created the Rishabsingh.nitt account. Please note that the Rishabsingh.nitt account is for social media purposes. Sometimes, I used my original account and the other account for editing other articles in Wikipedia, such as sporting events. I apologize for my actions of creating another account in Wikipedia. I did some mistakes in the past in editing the Wikipedia articles as I was not aware of its guidelines, and that's why my original account got blocked. I also did mistakes when I used the other account in editing the Wikipedia articles. That's why my other account also got blocked, which was also identified as a sockpuppet of my original account due to the similar Wikipedia page topics. I want to tell you that I have now read Wikipedia's rules and guidelines, and I promise I will not create any more accounts in Wikipedia. I also promise that I will edit Wikipedia articles according to its rules and guidelines. Two of my family members created the accounts Sheffieldgraduate and Tigerson1995. These two accounts are not my accounts. We all share the same internet connection and use the same device too. Our choice of topics of Wikipedia articles for editing matches too. Since we share the same internet connection and device, our account's IP address would match also. This led to the conversion of Sheffieldgraduate and Tigerson1995 accounts into sockpuppets of my account. I have proposed improvements for the Wikipedia article Chiisagata District, Nagano, which are mentioned above. Please check those improvements. Hence, I kindly request you to unblock my original account Rishabsingh97, my other account Rishabsingh.nitt, and also the accounts Sheffieldgraduate and Tigerson1995 used by my family members as soon as possible. Thank You. Rishabsingh97 (talk) 13:01, 26 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Thank you for disclosing the other accounts that you have used, but you're going to need to more specifically identify what the problems with your past edits were in order to demonstrate that you will not repeat this behavior. signed, Rosguill talk 19:26, 14 December 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rishabsingh97 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

As I explained in my previous unblock request that I created my original account Rishabsingh97 so that I could edit some of my favourite articles on Wikipedia. I understand that I violated Wikipedia's rules and guidelines, and that's why the Wikipedia administrator blocked my original account. I, then, created the other account Rishabsingh.nitt. As I work as an associate at an institution, I used the Rishabsingh.nitt account to edit the institution's Wikipedia article. That's why I created the Rishabsingh.nitt account. Please note that the Rishabsingh.nitt account is for social media purposes. Sometimes, I used my original account and the other account for editing other articles on Wikipedia, such as sporting events. I apologize for my actions of creating another account in Wikipedia. I did some mistakes in the past in editing the Wikipedia articles as I was young and not aware of the Wikipedia guidelines, and that's why my original account got blocked. I understand that I made mistakes in uploading some copyrighted images with no license in some Wikipedia articles. I apologize for my action, and I promise I will not commit this mistake hereafter. I also made mistakes when I created and used the other account Rishabsingh.nitt in editing the Wikipedia articles. That's why my other account also got blocked, which was also identified as a sockpuppet of my original account due to the similar Wikipedia page topics. I want to tell you that I have now read Wikipedia's rules and guidelines, and I promise I will not create any more accounts in Wikipedia. I also promise I will edit Wikipedia articles and upload images in them according to its rules and guidelines. Two of my family members created the accounts Sheffieldgraduate and Tigerson1995. These two accounts are not my accounts. We all share the same internet connection and use the same device too. Our choice of topics of Wikipedia articles for editing matches too. Since we share the same internet connection and device, our account's IP address would match also. This led to the conversion of Sheffieldgraduate and Tigerson1995 accounts into sockpuppets of my account. I have proposed improvements for the Wikipedia article Chiisagata District, Nagano, which are mentioned above. Please check those improvements. Hence, I kindly request you to unblock my original account Rishabsingh97, my other account Rishabsingh.nitt, and also the accounts Sheffieldgraduate and Tigerson1995 used by my family members as soon as possible. Thank You. Rishabsingh97 (talk) 7:02 am, 31 August 2021, Tuesday (1 month, 10 days ago) (UTC−7)

Decline reason:

I just do not find this rationale convincing. Sockpuppetry, COI editing, "my little brother did it on my device"... no. ♠PMC(talk) 06:32, 10 October 2021 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Why should we believe you, when you recently lied about not having other accounts? [2] Meters (talk) 17:47, 31 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Meters: Hi. In January 2018, when I checked that my Rishabsingh.nitt account was blocked due to Sockpuppet, I didn’t understand the meaning of it. Then, when I requested Wikipedia in November 2020, to unblock my account Rishabsingh.nitt, I forgot that I had an account called Rishabsingh97, which was my first account. I, then, read all the rules and guidelines of Wikipedia. Now, I am requesting you to please unblock my account, and I will not repeat the mistakes which I did earlier and will always obey the rules and guidelines of Wikipedia while editing their articles. I also promise that I will use one account in Wikipedia. Thank you. --Rishabsingh97 (talk) 07:18, 1 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Unblock edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rishabsingh97 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

As I explained in my previous two unblock requests that I created my original account Rishabsingh97 so that I could edit some of my favourite articles on Wikipedia. I understand that I violated Wikipedia's rules and guidelines, and that's why the Wikipedia administrator blocked my original account. I, then, created the other account Rishabsingh.nitt. I work as an associate at an institution, which is a volunteering role, and I used the Rishabsingh.nitt account to edit the institution's Wikipedia article. That's why I created the Rishabsingh.nitt account. Please note that the Rishabsingh.nitt account is for social media purposes. Sometimes, I used my original account and the other account for editing other articles on Wikipedia, such as sporting events. I apologize for my actions of creating another account in Wikipedia. I did some mistakes in the past in editing the Wikipedia articles as I was young and not aware of the Wikipedia guidelines, and that's why my original account got blocked. I understand that I made mistakes in uploading some copyrighted images with no license in some Wikipedia articles. I apologize for my action, and I promise I will not commit this mistake hereafter. I also made mistakes when I created and used the other account Rishabsingh.nitt in editing the Wikipedia articles. That's why my other account also got blocked, which was also identified as a sockpuppet of my original account due to the similar Wikipedia page topics. I want to tell you that I have now read Wikipedia's rules and guidelines, and I promise I will not create any more accounts in Wikipedia. I also promise I will edit Wikipedia articles and upload images in them according to its rules and guidelines. Two of my family members created the accounts Sheffieldgraduate and Tigerson1995. These two accounts are not my accounts. We all share the same internet connection and use the same device too. Our choice of topics of Wikipedia articles for editing matches too. Since we share the same internet connection and device, our account's IP address would match also. This led to the conversion of Sheffieldgraduate and Tigerson1995 accounts into sockpuppets of my account. I promise that I will not share my device with any other person to create and edit Wikipedia articles. I also want to tell you that I am not paid to make and edit Wikipedia articles. I am aware of the conflict of interest Wikipedia guidelines, and I edit Wikipedia without being paid. I have proposed improvements for the Wikipedia article Chiisagata District, Nagano, which are mentioned above. Please check those improvements. Hence, I kindly request you to unblock my original account Rishabsingh97, my other account Rishabsingh.nitt, and also the accounts Sheffieldgraduate and Tigerson1995 used by my family members as soon as possible. Thank You. Rishabsingh97 (talk) 18:45, 25 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

All these walls o' text are really doing is coming across as obfuscation and, frankly, attempts to admin shop. You don't seem to have said anything new here, and you expect us to believe that those accounts that share your IP and editing interests are ... family members. You also admit to past promotional editing without any apparent regard for the fact that that's a major violation of policy ... it just happens, I guess. You also say you were "too young" to understand policy in the past, when we have plenty of teenaged editors who understand this quite well, and to which I can only really say "thou hadst been old before thou hadst been wise".

As polite about this as you have been, your apparent strategy of simply restating a declined request has grown tiresome, and it's time—actually, well past time—to revoke your access to this page so you won't waste any more of our time (and, you may not realize at first, but you will later, yours). Have a nice day. — Daniel Case (talk) 18:44, 27 November 2021 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Daniel Case (talk) 18:47, 27 November 2021 (UTC)Reply