Your submission at Articles for creation: Raja Randh Deo of Argal kingdom (July 30) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 13:56, 30 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Rishabh.s2123! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 13:56, 30 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hi@S0091,please go through the references i had given as they are the only reliable source about raj era and considered as useful for the topic
hence,it is requested to you sir@S0091 that you please review my draft Rishabh.s2123 (talk) 15:51, 30 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
I have already reviewed the draft. You need sources written post Raj Era. S0091 (talk) 15:59, 30 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hi@S0091,added some more reliable source about raj era, it is requested to you sir that you must go through all references mentioned Rishabh.s2123 (talk) 07:59, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
You have resubmitted it so another reviewer will take a look. S0091 (talk) 14:14, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Shakya descend claims edit

Your Argal kingdom descend claims have been reverted three times now; time to stop. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 06:08, 11 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

hello@Joshua Jonathan kindly provide details for your reverts as i provided my claim with valid source but on the other side ypu aren"t providing reason/source of your reverts.kindly do revert edits with valid reasons Rishabh.s2123 (talk) 10:41, 11 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
See the edit-summary diff. No mention of Argal in that source, hence no valid source. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 11:40, 11 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Gidhaur chieftaincy edit

Despite what you claimed in your reverts at Gidhaur chieftaincy, I had given reasons for my edits. I have reverted you & suggest that you read WP:RAJ and WP:V. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 08:14, 16 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

October 2023 edit

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Battle of Chandawar. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. HistoryofIran (talk) 15:26, 23 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Raja Randh Deo of Argal kingdom (November 3) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Stuartyeates (talk) 04:29, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Blocked for sockpuppetry edit

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 7 days for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rishabh.s2123. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Vanjagenije (talk) 16:21, 9 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Raja Randh Deo of Argal kingdom edit

  Hello, Rishabh.s2123. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Raja Randh Deo of Argal kingdom, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:10, 4 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Raja Randh Deo of Argal kingdom edit

 

Hello, Rishabh.s2123. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Raja Randh Deo of Argal kingdom".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 01:24, 5 May 2024 (UTC)Reply