Rishab Sharmaa

This is Rishab Sharmaa's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chandigarh Group of Colleges, Jhanjeri (September 3)

Latest comment: 4 hours ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chandigarh Group of Colleges, Jhanjeri and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:41, 3 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Rishab Sharmaa! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:41, 3 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account has been used to evade the effect of blocks on other accounts used on behalf of the same business, because all the accounts involved, including this one, evidently exist for the purpose of using Wikipedia to promote your colleges, which, as has already been explained, is unacceptable, and because you have been editing in violation of Wikipedia's conflict of interest guideline and the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use. To make sure that this is clear, the situation has now been explained on the talk pages of at least ten accounts used to post spam for your business. Neither the business nor anyone working on its behalf needs any more warnings: any future accounts are likely to be blocked without further notice.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. JBW (talk) 23:05, 3 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Rishab Sharmaa (talk) 12:08, 4 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic