Hi, guys. This is my talk page.

Maviva Dispute edit

If you've reached this page to fuss about reverting "Martin/Aviva appears to have romantic feelings for Aviva/Martin" read this first:

Regarding Wild Kratts, specifically Martin and Aviva, the following points were outlined on the talk page: *There is still no definitive proof, not by what Wikipedia considers proof. WP:NOR

*It is in fact biased. Newcomers to the page are not given the chance to watch the show and form their own opinion of the pairing. WP:NPOV

*The edit uses weasel words, which is another no-no. WP:W2W

*It often uses words like "seems" or "appear" in order to -weasel- (get it?) the reader into taking the statement as fact when it is unconfirmed.

The issue is not brought up because saying that they are not in a relationship will also bias the article, so it's best not to bring it up. If you post that info, I will revert it. If you add it again, I will simply revert it. If you put it once more, I will not revert it, but simply report it. I will not let this article fall into another edit war over this puerile issue. Consensus says that the edit and it's opposite (that they are not in love) are biased, and neither is allowed, which is why neither view is supported by the article. All evidence supporting either side is Original Research and Synthesis of Information. You should just let it go, because it's not going to stay on there as long as I'm editing. RigorMorticius (talk)

When one of you cites a reliable, third party source for your stance, the edit will be allowed to stay. Until then, it's not happening.

Other than that, happy editing. RigorMorticius (talk) 09:37, 24 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of User:RigorMorticius/Wild Kratts Shipping War edit

 

A tag has been placed on User:RigorMorticius/Wild Kratts Shipping War requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 19:20, 20 March 2016 (UTC)Reply