Rightone11

Welcome!

Hello, Rightone11, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Edcolins (talk) 14:52, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

Apotex Inc. v. Sanofi‑Synthelabo Canada Inc.

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Apotex Inc. v. Sanofi‑Synthelabo Canada Inc., and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.internationallawoffice.com/Newsletters/detail.aspx?g=02e1d499-f35d-46ee-a0e1-2c552d6f0072.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:37, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

Suggestions

It's great to haver these articles on Canadian patent law. But I have marked a few of them for lacking context: What I mean by this, is that the articles need some explanation of what the state of the law was before the case was decided, and the effect of the case on subsequent developments. It also needs to be compared in each case with the corresponding situations in at least patent law in the US (which I gather it most closely resembles) and in the UK. It would help also to have some indication of the arguments pro and con. Otherwise, its just reporting the decision without furtnishing much morethan directory information. DGG ( talk ) 08:07, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

I see you've dealt with some of it. The only one I still have problems with is Apotex Inc. v. Sanofi‑Synthelabo Canada Inc. The lede says it is about whether "selection patents" are invalid, saying the case found they are valid. But the article does not talk about that concept only other ones, which I suppose are related to it closely, or are elements of what is mean by 'selection patents" . This seems really unclear, & I would not be able to clear it up except by either a good deal of related reading, or going to the decision myself. I'm not going to do that, for I see every reason to think I'd make blunders in trying to explain Canadian patent law-- it's up to you to do it. Even if the necesary material is covered under other articles here , needs to be explained at this one . A Wikipedia articles is meant for non-experts, and should be relatively self-contained. DGG ( talk ) 23:49, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Shell Oil Co. v. Commissioner of Patents, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Patent Act (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Teva Canada Ltd. v. Pfizer Canada Inc., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Teva (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:49, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Teva Canada Ltd. v. Pfizer Canada Inc.

The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)