Welcome! edit

Hello, Riders&Rangers, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to User talk:Rodw. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — Rod talk 16:37, 22 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Haunting hour episode list edit

Thanks for your message about "Haunting hour episode list" but I'm afraid I have no idea which article this relates to. I suspect you could correct the error yourself.— Rod talk 16:39, 22 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Apostrophes edit

Hi. I did explain in the edit summary but there's no harm in doing so here. Please review MOS:POSS. It is not ambiguous.

Singular nouns For the possessive of singular nouns, including proper names and words ending with an s, add 's (my daughter's achievement, my niece's wedding, Cortez's men, the boss's office, Glass's books, Illinois's largest employer, Descartes's philosophy, Verreaux's eagle). Exception: abstract nouns ending with an /s/ sound, when followed by sake (for goodness' sake, for his conscience' sake). If a name already ends in s or z and would be difficult to pronounce if 's were added to the end, consider rearranging the phrase to avoid the difficulty: Jesus's teachings or the teachings of Jesus.

NEDOCHAN (talk) 10:41, 9 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Re: Thank You edit

Yes, I can do that as well. It's just a case of using the 'find and replace' function in MS Word to strip away the tags. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 22:15, 20 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Blocked edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Riders&Rangers (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

You've got the wrong person and the wrong address

Decline reason:

Your block is based on technical evidence and can not be appealed by simple denial. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:24, 8 April 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.