Your submission at Articles for creation: BoAt (February 13) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by RPSkokie were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
RPSkokie (talk) 08:11, 13 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Rickinmorty! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! RPSkokie (talk) 08:11, 13 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Suzanne Maman (March 7) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Idoghor Melody were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 20:15, 7 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jared Goldstein (March 7) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Idoghor Melody was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 20:22, 7 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Suzanne Maman (March 8) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nomadicghumakkad was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 11:58, 8 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Jared Goldstein has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jared Goldstein. Thanks! Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 11:59, 8 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Suzanne Maman has been accepted edit

 
Suzanne Maman, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 16:35, 12 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thank You admin to approve my first page. I am very very happy today. Rickinmorty (talk) 16:37, 12 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: BoAt Lifestyle has been accepted edit

 
BoAt Lifestyle, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 16:37, 12 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

BoAt Lifestyle moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, BoAt Lifestyle, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CUPIDICAE💕 16:18, 15 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jared Goldstein (March 20) edit

 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reasons left by Hatchens were: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.
Hatchens (talk) 04:27, 20 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chris Estrada (comic) (March 20) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Hatchens were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Hatchens (talk) 04:28, 20 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: BoAt Lifestyle has been accepted edit

 
BoAt Lifestyle, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Behind the moors (talk) 07:47, 2 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

BoAt Lifestyle moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, BoAt Lifestyle, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CUPIDICAE💕 17:59, 4 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Praxidicae: This has been accepted at AfC twice now and clearly appears to me to pass GNG. Is there something else you're looking for here? Bsoyka (talk) 12:52, 6 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
Again, How many times this need to be done?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rickinmorty (talkcontribs)

BoAt Lifestyle moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, BoAt Lifestyle, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hatchens (talk) 16:03, 7 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

April 2022 edit

  Hello, I'm Hatchens. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Draft:BoAt Lifestyle have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Hatchens (talk) 16:05, 7 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

BoAt Lifestyle moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, BoAt Lifestyle, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE💕 19:20, 16 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

This is already well sourced. [1], [2], [3], [4] . PRAXIDICAE can you google the sources you like? Rickinmorty (talk) 03:50, 17 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

South Bengal Museum moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, South Bengal Museum, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE💕 19:23, 16 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

PRAXIDICAE let me again google the guidelines for this page and add sources. Rickinmorty (talk) 03:31, 17 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
I saw the WP:Museum Guidelines, and add 2 para and sources accordingly. Do you want to refer any other guidelines? Rickinmorty (talk) 03:51, 17 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
What you added (and Praxidicae removed) are not references to confirm notability, as all they do is confirm the museum exists. What is necessary are published articles ABOUT the museum - its history, the nature of its collection, etc.

Your thread has been archived edit

 

Hi Rickinmorty! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Notability Doubt, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.


See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 24 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Kenneth Mayer for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kenneth Mayer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenneth Mayer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

North8000 (talk) 20:12, 28 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: BoAt Lifestyle (July 6) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Akevsharma was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Akevsharma (talk) 02:15, 6 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Jared Goldstein edit

  Hello, Rickinmorty. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jared Goldstein, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:05, 20 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Chris Estrada (comic) edit

  Hello, Rickinmorty. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chris Estrada (comic), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:05, 20 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Jared Goldstein edit

 

Hello, Rickinmorty. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jared Goldstein".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 04:30, 20 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Chris Estrada (comic) edit

 

Hello, Rickinmorty. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Chris Estrada".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 04:30, 20 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:South Bengal Museum edit

  Hello, Rickinmorty. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:South Bengal Museum, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:22, 30 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:BoAt Lifestyle edit

  Hello, Rickinmorty. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:BoAt Lifestyle, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:01, 6 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:BoAt Lifestyle has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:BoAt Lifestyle. Thanks! Pbritti (talk) 15:47, 9 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:BoAt Lifestyle edit

 

Hello, Rickinmorty. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "BoAt Lifestyle".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:14, 30 September 2023 (UTC)Reply