Richmondwriter
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Clearpoint credit counseling solutions, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Clearpoint credit counseling solutions is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Clearpoint credit counseling solutions, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 19:50, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of ClearPoint Credit Counseling Solutions edit
A tag has been placed on ClearPoint Credit Counseling Solutions, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. KelleyCook (talk) 18:39, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of User:Richmondwriter edit
A tag has been placed on User:Richmondwriter, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Alexius08 (talk) 00:33, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of ClearPoint Credit Counseling Solutions edit
I have nominated ClearPoint Credit Counseling Solutions, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ClearPoint Credit Counseling Solutions. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Alexius08 (talk) 00:36, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Your userpage edit
You wrote, "It was my impression that I was the only one seeing contents of my userpage; perhaps I misunderstood." I'm afraid that you did misunderstand what a userpage is and does. Your userpage is your public face, the place in which you show the other Wikipedia editors (and readers) who this editor is and how his/her edits should be viewed. Thus, if you see that editor so-and-so has edited an article in a certain manner, you could go to their userpage to see what information they have chosen to provide as an aid to understanding where they are coming from. Some editors have no userpage (or only a stub of one), preferring to let their work speak for itself, which is a perfectly valid stance to take. Others are more overt. (Mine, for example, openly states my credentials (such as they are), my fields of interest and expertise, and my political, ideological, and religious positions, as well as a bit about my philosophy of editing.) --Orange Mike | Talk 15:37, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
The above-mentioned article has been suggested as an article for deletion, on grounds of notability. Please note that in any discussion of an article's suitability for Wikipedia, the fact that other similar articles exist is not considered grounds for retention of a dubious article. (It may, however, serve as a hint as to the existence of other articles which do not belong here.) --Orange Mike | Talk 15:42, 24 September 2009 (UTC)