November 2019 edit

  Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Richland, Georgia—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 14:09, 30 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Are you from Richland, GA? edit

Are you from Richland Ga? How much do y’all know about our city? RichlandGA (talk) 14:14, 30 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Richland, Georgia. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 16:26, 30 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Brody Cobb! edit

How is adding information about a local, talented musician and guitar builder vandalism? We as a town are proud of Brody and his many accomplishments! Please stop deleting our edit! RichlandGA (talk) 17:22, 30 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

November 2019 edit

  Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 17:36, 30 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Richland, Georgia. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 17:46, 30 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

November 2019 edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you purposefully and blatantly harass a fellow Wikipedian, as you did at User:Serols. Making threats of lawsuits on Wikipedia are not tolerated, and are, unfortunately, an excellent way to get WP:BANned.--Mr Fink (talk) 00:24, 1 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

December 2019 edit

 
You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 00:25, 1 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
User is confirmed to be socking as Special:Contributions/StewartCoGA. ST47 (talk) 01:19, 1 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RichlandGA (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

No legal action will be taken. Wikipedia needs to stops harassing our small city and leaves our contributions and edits alone

Decline reason:

This is no longer the reason for your block. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:45, 1 December 2019 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion, and for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:44, 1 December 2019 (UTC)Reply