RicardoC
Entirely inappropriate personal attack written in this space, suggesting that this user should edit the articles directly instead of just complaining about 'POV' and adding 'clean up' tags. TTLR (oh wait... just in case the wikihistory button doesn't work on your computer...) TTLightningRod 23:58, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
Poll on Castro image edit
Over on the Castro talk page, you commented, "I'm in favor of the lectern image, myself. Far more visually interesting, and it works perfectly in terms of POV". However, you added your name to the "do not use the lectern image" part of the poll. I am pretty certain that this was just a confusion over how the two poll sections were arranged (I tried to clear them up by a little rearrangment).
Would you mind correcting your vote, if I understand your intent. I had done it myself, since your comment seemed clear enough. But then Squeakbox "restored" your vote to its old form (I think s/he just wants your vote to fall with his/hers, actually). Obviously, it's your choice where you want the vote. Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 17:25, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
Message regarding your use of the No Multi License Template edit
In case you are not aware, the Wikimedia Foundation has proposed that the copyright licensing terms on the wikis operated by the WMF – including Wikipedia – be changed to include the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC-BY-SA) license in addition to the current GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) as allowed by version 1.3 of the GFDL. The community has approved this change with 75.8% in favor, and on June 15, 2009, the change will take effect.
You currently have {{NoMultiLicense}} on your user or user talk page, which states that your edits are licensed under the GFDL only. On or before June 15, this template will be changed to reflect Wikipedia's new licensing terms. If you accept the licensing change, you do not need to do anything (and feel free to remove this message); if you do not accept it, we regret that you will no longer be able to contribute to the encyclopedia. Please join the discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#NoMultiLicense template if you have any comments.
Delivered by The Helpful Bot at 20:22, 2 June 2009 (UTC) for the Village pump. Report errors here.
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)