User talk:Revolution1221/Archive 2
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
A page you started has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Ellen James (author), Revolution1221!
Wikipedia editor I dream of horses just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
I added a stub template and several categories.
To reply, leave a comment on I dream of horses's talk page.
Sakura Andō: Revision history
Hallo, because I'm not a native english speaker: could you please explain "R2"? This REDIRECT was accidently created by me and so I thought it could be deleted. Could you be please so kindly and tell my what kind of "db" is correct? Many thanks in advance and sorry for my bad English (by the way, I would be happy, if you can show me my language mistakes, sure!). Kindly reg, --Kettentaucher (talk) 16:03, 25 March 2013 (UTC) EDIT: The same thing should be done with Andō Sakura. --Kettentaucher (talk) 16:05, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
- Certainly! R2 Deletion is when a redirect redirects to a page that isn't a article page, like a talk page or user page. The page would probably meet R3, as the English language does not use acutes and therefore probably wouldn't use the wrong one, or G7, if you WANT the page deleted. As for English mistakes, your English is good, except for some extraneous commas. Happy editing!Revolution1221 (talk) 16:13, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Original Barnstar |
| Thanks a lot! Kettentaucher (talk) 16:26, 25 March 2013 (UTC) |
CFIA disambiguation page
What is your reasoning behind the edit reverts on the CFIA disambiguation page? You don't feel a need to respond to this? You revert everything I've done, and then simply use the reasoning "no explanation used". Huh? This is not true. I've explained my edits very clearly on the talk page. Please explain yourself. Petemustard (talk) 22:05, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
- I sincerely apologize. I didn't see the talk page and I thought the edits were vandalism. I am not an expert in the CFIA. My bad. Revolution1221 (talk) 22:09, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
- No problem man. I appreciate the response. No vandalism, just honest intent. Petemustard (talk) 22:19, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
- I changed the order again in respect of wikpedia's topic order, but left the descriptions. I accidentally deleted them last time. Sorry about that. Petemustard (talk) 22:19, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 22:10, 26 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Ali Al Bazergan
Hi, I orginally produced the page, I will be translating it into arabic with sources. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alipiero (talk • contribs) 18:59, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Okay. Next time, could you explain why in your edit summary or on the talk page? Revolution1221 (talk) 19:02, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges. A full list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on will be at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
- Wikipedia:Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
- Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
- Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
INeverCry 00:48, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello. You're supporting the inclusion of unsourced stuff into articles with this edit, which is against the verifiability policy. Just wanted to let you know that I've reverted it, along with the companion one, and also warned the IP user who added it (two times, so far). Moreover, it was agreed not to include Skytrax-related information into airline articles.--Jetstreamer Talk 12:49, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
- Oh. Sorry, I didn't see the discussion. I had previously rejected the changes. But, the information was verifiable. Cubana is based in Havana. Revolution1221 (talk) 15:00, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, I know that. The problem was not your edit, actually, but this previous one. Regards.--Jetstreamer Talk 16:50, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
|
The Original Barnstar |
| I see you've cleaned up one of my 1st articles - thanks for showing me the way Ajkinwales (talk) 17:41, 31 March 2013 (UTC) |
Talkback: you've got messages!
Message added by Theopolisme at 17:55, 31 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
What have.....
....I done now?! [1] ;-) Ryan PostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 20:17, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
- I was patrolling short pages, and I saw the redirect Wayne rooney. So, I looked at it. This IP replaced it with something along the lines of "Wayne rooney is fat". So I nominated it as an attack page with Twinkle. Then it said "Notifying page creator (Ryan Postlethwaite)". I immediately clicked out and removed the warning ASAP. Sorry, whack me with a wet trout if you want. Revolution1221 (talk) 20:23, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
- No need for a wet trout, I thought it was quite amusing actually! I haven't been warned for years! Keep up the good work by the way - You seem to be doing a fantastic job! :-) Ryan PostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 23:03, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 17:16, 1 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
While certainly helpful in getting press coverage , it is not required under WP:NF that actors, writers, producers or directors be themselves independently notable or have their own articles. That's for the future. And while also helpful in gaining press coverage, WP:NF does not require that a film be a high-grossing studio blockbuster. What is a requirement under WP:NF is that a film receive coverage and analysis in independent sources. Evidence (film) has such coverage, as has been reflected in the article's expansion and improvement since you took it to AFD six minutes after it was created. More can be done, certainly, but we do well to not rush a brand new article into the ash heap. Is it one of the most notable films ever? No, not by a long shot. Does it have enough accepted genre coverage suitable for a low-budget independent film to merit inclusion within Wikipedia? I think yes. You are cordially invited back to the discussion. Best regards, Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 07:16, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
sorry for removing the stuff on that toadstool page
I was just trying to see what had been done before the redirect and i didnt know how to go along doing it. im really sorry — Preceding unsigned comment added by Topazmarauder (talk • contribs) 00:57, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
- Oh, no worries, it's fine. I misinterpreted it as vandalism. No bad feelings. Revolution1221 (talk · email · contributions) 00:59, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
The article Sanco S.A. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Reads like promotion. WP:NOTABILITY not established.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 16:05, 4 April 2013 (UTC)