Reuentahl404

Peer Review

Hello, I thought that your content so far was interesting! I enjoyed the addition of the Chinese characters that you added and I thought it supplemented the article well. I noticed a few grammatical errors in your content, such as the lack of the word "the" before the time periods (eg. after the 1920's vs after 1920's), and there was one sentence where you changed from the past tense to the present tense, but other than that it was really organized and well written! I'm sure your content will be very informative once you add in your other sources and references. Good job! -Brittanyli (talk) 18:17, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Siyuan Cheng (talk) 00:30, 30 October 2020 (UTC) The overall structure is very good, and the references are very clear to understand. But some introductions are too general. If you add more description, you can make your argument clearer and stronger.