Retois

Be careful

You have been making (sometimes wholescale) changes to a number of articles without providing an edit summary explaining your edit, or checking that informaiton you have changed or inserted is properly referenced. Please be more careful. As a new user, you will be allowed a certain leeway, but that is likely to lessen without more care. Bazza (talk) 11:55, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

Please also acquaint yourself with WP:BRD. Bazza (talk) 11:57, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

However, given the revert of my most recent edit, i fear you are not taking my point on board at all!

All I did in that edit was simply better align the article to the sources used. Retois (talk) 12:01, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

If I am making an edit, it is simply to improve the quality of the article, and done with care and consideration. Also, I avoid adding anything which is influenced by opinion, as I believe objectivity, whilst considering subjectivity, is the best thing.

I’m surprised at your revert without even considering my edits, as if they just had nothing constructive within them… Retois (talk) 12:09, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

Good afternoon (assuming you are in the UK). I appreciate your comment, it is my intention to provide at least a single edit summary explaining any changes, however I understand this may have been missed/forgotten on occasion.

Thanks,

Retois Retois (talk) 11:59, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

It looks like you have chosen not to follow WP:BRD. Please do so by:

1. reverting the article back to its previous state; and
2. starting a discussion on its talk page about how you think the article can be improved and why.

Bazza (talk) 12:11, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

Another established user thanked me for the edit which you are requesting for me to delete. Retois (talk) 12:22, 3 September 2023 (UTC)