Restar32

Hello, Restar32, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! SwisterTwister talk 21:39, 25 January 2012 (UTC) Getting started Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Biographies for people in the film industry

I don't think that all the articles you are creating meet the notability guidelines at WP:FILMMAKER. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 22:24, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Academy Award nominations qualify as having "won significant critical attention" (criteria #4). Restar32 (talk) 22:27, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

perhpas, but the nomination is for the film not the person. In particular, you need to really create a balanced biography, which shows what films that the person has worked on throughout their career. Why don't you write articles on the films first rather than the directors? Barney the barney barney (talk) 22:38, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Which was created first - the chicken or the egg? Do not worry your mind over such concerns, for it matters not a whit. Restar32 (talk) 22:16, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Gigi Causey for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gigi Causey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gigi Causey until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 23:04, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of John Richardson (special effects designer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Richardson (special effects designer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Richardson (special effects designer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 08:26, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Imdb as a source

Please don't use Imdb as a source if there are other sources available. Take a look at some of the articles you have created recently, and see how other, far more reliable and independent sources are available in many cases. --DThomsen8 (talk) 03:20, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

• You are right. There are many better sources that can be used, and additional and better sources have been added to these articles. Cheers. Restar32 (talk) 20:56, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Swen Gillberg

The article Swen Gillberg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability. A film he worked on was nominated. He was not directly nominated.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. James086^Talk 21:08, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of John Rosengrant

The article John Rosengrant has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A nominee for an award but not a recipient. No evience of any notability. Fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   10:30, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Laurence Bennett

The article Laurence Bennett has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to be notable only due to be nominated for an award. Fails WP:NBIO since people notable only for one event usually don't pass it.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kirbanzo (talk) 17:00, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Robin Fryday

The article Robin Fryday has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Little evience of any notability. Fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sahaib3005 (talk) 19:19, 19 November 2021 (UTC)