RenHub

Welcome!

Hello, RenHub, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:RenHub/sandbox, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

• Article development
• Standard layout
• Lead section
• The perfect article
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Schminnte (talk • contribs) 16:11, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:RenHub/sandbox

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:RenHub/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be advertising which only promotes or publicises someone or something. Promotional editing of any kind is not permitted, whether it be promotion of a person, company, product, group, service, belief, or anything else. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Schminnte (talk • contribs) 16:11, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

June 2023

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of username and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:

• Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
• Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
• Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Lourdes 08:18, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

RenHub (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

ENITSIRHC (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

If ever I contradict the policy of editing, I will make sure to make articles that will follow to it.

Decline reason:

Your proposed username looks okay, but I cannot understand your reason. PhilKnight (talk) 16:38, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

RenHub (talk) 14:54, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

RenHub (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

Chrisgres (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

My deepest apologies for the inappropriate edits and actions that led to my block on Wikipedia. I fully understand and acknowledge that my behavior violated the guidelines set forth by Wikipedia, and I take full responsibility for my actions.I am sincerely remorseful for any harm or disruption caused by my edits. Upon reflecting on the situation, I now realize the significance of adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines, which are crucial for maintaining the integrity, reliability, and credibility of this esteemed platform. RenHub (talk) 20:51, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am summarily declining this request as your recent statements appear to be written by an AI. We want to hear from you, not an AI, as it is you who are blocked, not an AI. 331dot (talk) 22:53, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Dear Wikipedia Admins,

I am writing to express my deepest apologies for the inappropriate edits and actions that led to my block on Wikipedia. I fully understand and acknowledge that my behavior violated the guidelines set forth by Wikipedia, and I take full responsibility for my actions.

I am sincerely remorseful for any harm or disruption caused by my edits. Upon reflecting on the situation, I now realize the significance of adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines, which are crucial for maintaining the integrity, reliability, and credibility of this esteemed platform.

I would like to assure you that I have learned valuable lessons from this experience and am committed to making a positive change. I understand the specific policies and guidelines that I violated and comprehend the implications they have on the overall quality of content on Wikipedia.

Moving forward, I pledge to approach editing with greater care and responsibility. I will take the time to thoroughly familiarize myself with the policies and guidelines, ensuring that my contributions align with the highest standards of accuracy and neutrality. I am committed to being more cautious and meticulous in my future edits, always verifying information and citing reliable sources.

Furthermore, I humbly request the guidance and mentorship of experienced editors or administrators to enhance my understanding of Wikipedia's policies. I am eager to learn from those who have a wealth of knowledge and expertise in maintaining the excellence of this platform. Their guidance will undoubtedly contribute to my growth as a responsible contributor.

I would also like to highlight that I have previously made positive contributions to Wikipedia. While my recent mistakes overshadowed these efforts, I want to assure you that I have the capability and motivation to contribute constructively once again. I have taken the time to study and learn from my past experiences, which will serve as a foundation for my future edits.

Once again, I offer my sincerest apologies to the Wikipedia community, the admins, and anyone affected by my inappropriate actions. I am committed to rectifying my mistakes and proving myself as a trustworthy contributor. Thank you for considering my appeal, and I hope to have the opportunity to regain your trust and actively contribute to the improvement of Wikipedia.

Yours sincerely,

RenHub}}. RenHub (talk) 21:04, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

About half of this last post looks like it was AI-generated. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 21:43, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Hello Wikipedia Admins,

I am writing again this to you to know that it has always been my goal to uphold Wikipedia's guiding principles while giving readers accurate and useful information. Since the block, I've taken the time to carefully research Wikipedia's policies and procedures to ensure that I have a better knowledge of what the community expects. I sincerely apologize for any misconceptions or misinterpretations that may have resulted in this violation. You have my word that I've taken everything I've learnt from this into account and that I'll always act with the utmost honesty and professionalism. Please give me the chance to contribute once more to this esteemed platform. I am committed to abiding by all policies and guidelines set forth by Wikipedia and will actively engage with the community to improve the quality and accuracy of the content. RenHub (talk) 19:59, 29 June 2023 (UTC)