Red plosion

Welcome

Hello Red plosion! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Ghmyrtle (talk) 20:59, 19 November 2021 (UTC) Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Useful templates • Categories • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Tools • User scripts

Red plosion, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Red plosion! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Bsoyka (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Capital letters

Please don't over-use capital letters - per WP:CAPITALS. Ghmyrtle (talk) 21:02, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

...and also...

Please don't add new sections about individual band members in articles about bands. The members (in most cases - for example Gerry Marsden) already have their own articles, and Wikipedia does not support unnecessary duplication. Please look through all the advice in the welcome message above, or ask for advice in the Teahouse, rather than continuing to make poor quality edits that do not improve the encyclopedia. Thanks. Ghmyrtle (talk) 17:47, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

November 2021

Hello, I'm Sahaib3005. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Sahaib3005 (talk) 18:16, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Sahaib3005 (talk) 20:30, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gary and the Hornets, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Franklin. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 28 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Bernie Dwyer for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bernie Dwyer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bernie Dwyer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 19:37, 28 November 2021 (UTC)

Stop capitalising words

I have sorted out a few articles relating to Freddie and the Dreamers such as the band itself and the members where most words on those articles started with capital letters. I have uncapitalised them so please refrain from doing that again. 2A00:23C8:3D8D:DB01:B557:A050:BF45:4C57 (talk) 23:10, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jim Hendricks (musician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Atkinson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

Freddie Marsden

I have added ref ideas on the talk page for Freddie Marsden to which you created. Regards. Govvy (talk) 11:37, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Victor Moulton

The article Victor Moulton has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. — Mhawk10 (talk) 03:33, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

Buddy Randell moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Buddy Randell, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE🌈 23:06, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Draft:That one time in Wyoming when i attracted pnuemonoultramicroscopicsiliconvolcaniconiosis because of ya mom

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as Draft:That one time in Wyoming when i attracted pnuemonoultramicroscopicsiliconvolcaniconiosis because of ya mom, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been deleted. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:10, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Red plosion, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz Read! Talk! 05:11, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

December 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Freddie Marsden, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ghmyrtle (talk) 13:50, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

So far, people are being incredibly tolerant of your editing. However, you do need to take into account the comments that have been made about your edits - and, in particular, WP:MUSICBIO. Musicians who are members of notable bands but have no other claims to notability should not have articles written about them - "Members of notable bands are redirected to the band's article, not given individual articles, unless they have demonstrated individual notability." So, editors will continue to revert your edits unless you can explain why these musicians should have separate articles, based on previously published, reliable sources. If you continue to ignore advice, guidelines, and policies, you face the risk of being blocked from editing completely. Thanks. Ghmyrtle (talk) 14:13, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Buddy Randell for deletion

A discussion is taking place to determine if the article Buddy Randell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Buddy Randell until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Jalen Folf (talk) 18:10, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Refrain from making poor quality edits

I've been reverting some edits of yours recently that appear to be poor quality and mainly capitalising LOADS of words. All articles that you have made should probably be deleted and then there wouldn't be a waste of time for me and any other editors that would have to revert stuff that's poor quality. 2A00:23C8:3D8D:DB01:7D52:289D:D530:37A2 (talk) 20:06, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Little Big Time moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Little Big Time, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 20:41, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

@Red plosion: I have removed this to reviewed. It was legitamately reviewed on NPP and you decided to revert when there is no coverage on the article. The references are junk. It has been already redirected by another editor, so it is now in Draft:Little Big Time. Try and find secondary references. If it appears in mainspace with those references again, then I will need to send it to Afd and will be deleted, as they're is no coverage. I would save it, if I could. scope_creep^Talk 20:47, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

@Red plosion: I had another look at that article. There is a couple of references that are ok to get started, so they're is life in. You could trim it right back to seed article on those two references and will promoted with that. It can sit in mainspace for a couple while the Google graph is built, that way they'll be more sources coming. It is a strange effect that what was invisible before becomes available. Hope that helps. Merry Christmas. scope_creep^Talk 12:46, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Victor Moulton for deletion

A discussion is taking place to determine if the article Victor Moulton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victor Moulton until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

scope_creep^Talk 20:49, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Roy Crewdson for deletion

A discussion is taking place to determine if the article Roy Crewdson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roy Crewdson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

scope_creep^Talk 13:21, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Freddie Marsden for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Freddie Marsden is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freddie Marsden until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Ravenswing 03:17, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Derek Quinn for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Derek Quinn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Derek Quinn until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Ravenswing 03:17, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

January 2022

When adding links to material on external sites, as you did to Barry Whitwam, please ensure that the external site is not violating the creator's copyright. Linking to websites that display copyrighted works is acceptable as long as the website's operator has created or licensed the work. Knowingly directing others to a site that violates copyright may be considered contributory infringement. This is particularly relevant when linking to sites such as YouTube or Sci-Hub, where due care should be taken to avoid linking to material that violates its creator's copyright. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you believe the linked site is not violating copyright with respect to the material, then you should do one of the following:

• If the linked site is the copyright holder, leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page;
• If a note on the linked site credibly claims permission to host the material, or a note on the copyright holder's site grants such permission, leave a note on the article Talk page with a link to where we can find that note;
• If you are the copyright holder or the external site administrator, adjust the linked site to indicate permission as above and leave a note on the article Talk page;

If the material is available on a different site that satisfies one of the above conditions, link to that site instead. Toddst1 (talk) 18:30, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Pete Birrell shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Toddst1 (talk) 18:32, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Toddst1. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, May Harrison, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 18:35, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

March 2022

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 02:35, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:The Cog Crew

Hello, Red plosion. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Cog Crew, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Little Big Time

Hello, Red plosion. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Little Big Time, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Little Big Time

Hello, Red plosion. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Little Big Time".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 17:01, 3 August 2022 (UTC)