Your thread has been archived edit

 

Hi Reciprocal learning yute! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Hello! Advice on understanding Wiki, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 12 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Answer to your question about Wikipedians. edit

Hello! You wanted to know efforts from Wikipedians to keep it up and legitimate. So I am actually the lead coordinator of the Current Event WikiProject, which manages the Portal:Current events. My contributions to Wikipedia are normally entering the daily current events and helping grow new articles on those new topics.

Forgot to give a section about me. So I started editing Wikipedia back in 2019 and since then, I have been given 4 barnstars, which are Wikipedia awards and back in April 2020, I restarted the Current Event WikiProject.

Hopefully this helps. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask away! (P.S. I typed this on a phone, so I am sorry for grammar errors.) Elijahandskip (talk) 04:23, 7 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

    --Reciprocal learning yute (talk) 00:28, 8 February 2021 (UTC) Hi! wow congratulations that is great, and you do exactly what the project focuses on.Reply 

What intrigues me the most are your motivations in being part of wikipedia, the idea is to bring to light the effort that it requires to uphold wikipedia as what it is, efficient and legitimate. It would be great to hear more from you, Elijahandskip. RLY. --Reciprocal learning yute (talk) 00:28, 8 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Reciprocal learning yute:, So I have a few motivations to edit Wikipedia. One that is a major motivation is my goal to have a place to see 100% neutral news, aka the straight facts. Wikipedia isn't perfect, but in my opinion, the Portal:Current events is just about as close to neutral as you can get. So for me, I want to help show people neutral, straight to the point/facts news. Another motivation for me started back in August 2020. There was something I read (Outside of Wikipedia) that mentioned "Extreme bias moments on Wikipedia" and listed/showed some of those moments. For me wanting a place to read things without a bias, this hit home for me. Even though some things weren't current events, I started editing articles that I felt had a strong bias.
I ended up discovering a few biased things that were current event articles, so I started long and "painful" discussions on Wikipedia. One discussion is about 30 pages long (If you copy/paste it all into a word document to see page length). Some editors (Counting at 3 right now) have actually tried to get me banned from Wikipedia for wanting to make sure facts were stated. The admins that normally deal with the discussions on bans also are fairly prevalent in the current event articles, so out of 3 attempts to get me banned, only 1 ended in a warning. The other 2 attempts were just brushed off due to stupid reasons (And I assume partially because of my role in the Current Event WikiProject). So that is one of my main motivations to edit Wikipedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask away!

Elijahandskip (talk) 21:53, 8 February 2021 (UTC) RLY. --Elijahandskip Reciprocal learning yute (talk) 22:51, 8 March 2021 (UTC) ::@Elijahandskip: Wow, really that is an adventure, so much can really happen online. It seems to me that you have already lived a lot on wikipedia, so I am quite intrigued by your beginnings. I've noticed wikipedians really have a handle of sources, quotes, links etc., so it seems like something important to understand. thank you my friend, Reciprocal learning yute (talk) 22:51, 8 March 2021 (UTC)Reply