June 2022 edit

  Hello, I'm Sea Cow. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Sri Lankan cricket team in India in 2021–22—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Sea Cow (talk) 03:01, 30 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ad Orientem (talk) 03:24, 30 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Ban lift request edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Recentcontributorsedits (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I read every Wikipedia rules in last 2 days from WP:PG and know every single policy now. I will try to contribute to build an encyclopedia. I love my country and I accept in line with this I was a vandal and vandalized Wikipedia for 2 edits. I spent 24 hours with ban and I think it's enough for me according to policies. Sorry for disturbance again. Recentcontributorsedits (talk) 03:00, 2 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

I'm an administrator and I haven't read every policy- there are a lot, more than you probably think. We don't need you to know every policy, only to be willing to review the ones pertinent to your editing and be willing to have others pointed out to you if needed. This isn't just about the vandalism that got through, but that which you attempted to do and were blocked by filters. I'm not sure why you would need to read a single policy to know that you shouldn't vandalize an article, especially with nationalist postings. In any event, to be unblocked, you will need to tell us what edits you intend to make and why we should trust that you won't engage in nationalistic vandalism again. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 08:33, 2 July 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ban Lift 2 edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Recentcontributorsedits (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I want to contribute to the encyclopedia to leave my mark on the world with knowledge, and I need to be warned and unblocked as I understand my mistake, according to Wikipedia policies. I should have been warned rather than punished, but if you ask about what will I contribute, I can contribute articles on philosophy, art history and India. Thanks for check.

Accept reason:

Per WP:ROPE. (Read that carefully.) If you cause any more trouble, be aware that reblocking you will take three clicks on my mouse and perhaps ten seconds if I pause to take a drink of water. That said, I wish you well and hope you will become a productive member of the community. Best regards... Ad Orientem (talk) 19:51, 7 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

You have been unblocked. See my above note. -Ad Orientem (talk) 19:53, 7 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thank you very much I will be more careful about it. Regards. Recentcontributorsedits (talk) 00:53, 10 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

July 2022 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Western Armenia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Semsûrî (talk) 16:59, 22 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your feedback. Can I add irredentist part. Because it's only irredentism article that doesn't refer to irredentism. Recentcontributorsedits (talk) 17:02, 22 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet edit

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Beyoglou per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Beyoglou. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Girth Summit (blether) 10:42, 18 August 2022 (UTC)Reply