Rebeccawulff
I'm sorry I didn't receive any of these messages. New to this. I was not vandalizing the page. The information that has been put on the page is malicious and false. I'll be cautious moving forward. I understand how you can see that I was deleting posts that were not related to PETA, so I will provide exact notes and references on my edits. I would appreciate it if you would unblock me.
Rebeccawulff (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I'm sorry I didn't receive any of these messages. I'm new to this and did not know about messages. I was not vandalizing the page. The information that has been put on the page is malicious and false. However, I understand how you can see that I was deleting posts that were not related to PETA, so I will provide exact notes and references on my edits. I'll be cautious moving forward and I would appreciate it if you would unblock me.
Decline reason:
The information you repeatedly removed was sourced (yes, to PETA, but not exclusively to PETA). There may be some issues there with undue weight and whether or not PETA's materials should be relied on so exclusively ... but the proper way to deal with them is to raise those issues on the talk page, where it seems there's already been some active discussion. Not edit warring. — Daniel Case (talk) 03:37, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Please review the page history http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GW_Exotic_Animal_Foundation and see for yourself - many false attacking comments have been placed in the past few months and I was simply correcting them. This page has been filled with personal attacks and there is no valid information at all. I'm happy to work with you to get the correct information on the page.
- If you are willing to accept that you have to work it out on the talk page, and not edit war, an admin might be willing to unblock you. Daniel Case (talk) 03:37, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
Absolutely willing to use the talk page. I apologize. I did not know about the talk page. Sorry for my naivety.
July 2011 edit
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to GW Exotic Animal Foundation, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 19:10, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent edits do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the "sandbox" rather than in articles.
If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.
I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 19:10, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to GW Exotic Animal Foundation with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Shriram (talk) 19:16, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
- You're just removing content willy-nilly, including stuff that has nothing to do with PETA. Please stop; you're headed straight for a block. Discuss your issues on the article's talk page, please. Drmies (talk) 19:17, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. FASTILY (TALK) 19:30, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
This is your last warning; the next time you harm Wikipedia, as you did at GW Exotic Animal Foundation with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Shriram (talk) 19:19, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
Rebeccawulff (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Absolutely willing to use the talk page. I apologize. I did not know about the talk page. Sorry for my naivety.
Accept reason:
I am unblocking you because I accept that you are new and maybe didn't know all of Wikipedia's rules. In future, please discuss edits like these on the articles talk page, please note that if you edit like this again then you may find yourself blocked again 5 albert square (talk) 23:31, 1 August 2011 (UTC)