User talk:RayleeKL/Archive 1

July 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Kongregate, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

• Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Kongregate was changed by CocoaPuff310 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2010-07-23T20:37:52+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 20:37, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

OH COOL I CAN EDIT THIS TOO? LOL!!! TROLOLOL!!!

Userpage vandalism

Please do not vandalize userpages like you did in this[1] edit. And don't write fake edit summaries either, the automated bots and tools that show these edits read content, and no ambiguous edit summary will change that. Sellyme^Talk 04:31, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

February 2012

In general, a person or organization added to a list, as on June 7, should have a pre-existing article to establish notability. If you wish to create such an article, please confirm that your subject is notable according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Apparition^{11 Complaints}/Mistakes 23:19, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

February 2013

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Star Trek Into Darkness. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. 28bytes (talk) 06:27, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

October 2015

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Primefac (talk) 01:44, 2 October 2015 (UTC)