Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, RawTop, may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it sexual activity. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may file for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account and use that for editing. Thank you. Active Banana (talk) 21:53, 28 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

July 2010 edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Acroterion (talk) 22:10, 28 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
 

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RawTop (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I only posted a single, substantiated edit. Why am I being banned? I was not involved in vandalism etc.

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. See Marburgh and User:PozMyNegHole. --jpgordon::==( o ) 00:03, 29 July 2010 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RawTop (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I live in student accommodation. All units share the same IP address. I was not personally or knowingly responsible for any vandalism, including that which you cite above.

Decline reason:

Nonsense. Kuru (talk) 00:22, 29 July 2010 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RawTop (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Above admin has simply dismissed my appeal without supplying good reasons. As I said, there is no evidence of my being involved in disruptive activities.

Decline reason:

Quack quack! Do not make your situation worse by posting requests that insult the intelligence of the administrators reviewing these requests. It can make us very angry, very angry indeed. If you continue in this vein talk page access will be revoked (not that I can see you continuing in this vein much anyway 'cause you're not getting anywhere) — Daniel Case (talk) 03:00, 29 July 2010 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.