Your submission at Articles for creation: A Pillar of Salt (October 18) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Idoghor Melody was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 23:41, 18 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Ravenandadove! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 23:41, 18 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: A Pillar of Salt has been accepted edit

 
A Pillar of Salt, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bilorv (talk) 10:04, 24 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Spectacled caiman edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Spectacled caiman, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 05:02, 14 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Forrest Galante edit

Hi Ravenandadove, Instagram and other social media companies are not a basis for references in WP:BLP articles on Wikipedia, or indeed anything. IMDB, Linkedin, Instagram, Facebook, Tictok, tumblr, twitter, IMDB and many others shouldn't be used. They are non-rs. When you search WP:IMDB it show an entry for dodgy link that are not used here. From this point forward do not use them. If you continue to use them its warnings then up to the admin board for a block. Take this as warning. scope_creepTalk 09:37, 23 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

If you create an article, do not put an unsourced section and expect it to kept. Unsourced content has no place on Wikipedia. Sourcing for every sentence is the byword. scope_creepTalk 09:40, 23 March 2024 (UTC)Reply