Hi!

I'm unsure what you are doing. The reference you are adding to many articles does not seem particularly helpful. I intend to revert but wanted to ask first.--Jimbo Wales (talk) 13:01, 12 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

To be more precise: the author you are referencing and the book you are referencing appear to not really exist. The name "Kozma Prutkov" suggests you are joking. Please stop now.--Jimbo Wales (talk) 13:07, 12 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
This is an authentic work. All references are contained in the Annuaire de la Noblesse Moderne 2010 edited by Kozma Prutkov. The book is a reference to all European royalty and newly created nobility in Europe. The name used by Tolstoy is a coincidence. This work can be found by searching the ISSN. I will not stop using a useful reference.--Rapportroyal (Rapportroyal) 01:46, 14 April 2011 (CEST)
Perhaps you can help me find any evidence whatsoever of the existence of this work. Certainly, the two ISSN numbers you gave don't seem to turn anything up: 1925/5586 and 1925/5594 both yield nothing at OCLC.
Additionally, a google search for the title of the work you have given finds it only mentioned in the Wikipedia pages where you inserted it. (In English and French Wikipedia both...)
All evidence so far points to you simply making this up, but I'm happy to be guided to actual evidence. Please don't insert this again until we've settled this, ok?--Jimbo Wales (talk) 00:14, 13 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

July 2011 edit

Nomination of Annuaire de la Noblesse Moderne for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Annuaire de la Noblesse Moderne is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annuaire de la Noblesse Moderne until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 18:20, 9 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

November 2011 edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing, as you did at Prince Leka of Albania. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Drmies (talk) 17:02, 26 November 2011 (UTC)Reply