Recent edit to L V Muralikrishna Reddy edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, L V Muralikrishna Reddy, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 08:23, 9 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

Some of the material was copied directly from another website, and thus was a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Please don't add copyright material to Wikipedia. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:04, 11 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

December 2018 edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page L V Muralikrishna Reddy has been reverted.
Your edit here to L V Muralikrishna Reddy was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://aboutnitte.blogspot.com/2016/12/technology-excellence-award-for-honble.html, http://aboutnitte.blogspot.com/2016/12/technology-excellence-award-for-honble.html) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 09:42, 9 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to L V Muralikrishna Reddy have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Materialscientist (talk) 10:14, 9 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Rama.gogi, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit

 

Hi Rama.gogi! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Indian Technology Congress Association edit

Hello Rama.gogi,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Indian Technology Congress Association for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

JC7V (talk) 07:32, 18 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Re: edit

Hi, the article on Indian Technology Congress Association is marked for deletion under WP:G11 because it is so non neutral it needs to be deleted. See WP:WTW and WP:NPOV. It would need a complete rewrite to not be deleted for that reason. It's not being deleted for not being notable, but for being promotional. JC7V (talk) 07:51, 18 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Indian Technology Congress Association edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Indian Technology Congress Association requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Daiyusha (talk) 12:38, 18 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

December 2018 edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Galobtter (pingó mió) 12:44, 18 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

 
This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Rama.gogi (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #23610 was submitted on Dec 18, 2018 13:44:19. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 13:44, 18 December 2018 (UTC)Reply