Raluca Cretu
Welcome edit
Greetings...
Hello, Raluca Cretu, and welcome to Wikipedia!
Bibliography assignment edit
Hi, here are the details of the MRR annotated bibliography assignment...
Good Wikipedia articles are built on a foundation of good sources. In this respect, Wikipedia articles are not much different from academic essays. In fact, if anything a good Wikipedia article is more reliant on good sources than are other academic or scholarly texts. The whole notion of verifiability, which is the first of the encyclopedia's five pillars, depends upon reliable sources.
The aim of this bibliography assignment, then, is to identify, read, and comment on the most important and reliable sources that relate to the topic of your chosen article.
In coordination with your group, you need to do the following:
- Identify the most important sources for your topic. These will be both books and articles. They will vary depending upon the kind of topic you have chosen, but to give a couple of examples this book is a key one for the general topic of magic realism, while this biography would be essential for the article on Gabriel García Márquez.
- Use databases and the Koerner library catalogue to identify these sources. Look for as many as possible in the first instance; you will later choose between them. On the whole, they will not be online sources (though of course many articles are now available online thanks to JSTOR and other services).
- Aim to come up with a long list of, say, 5-20 books and perhaps 15-40 articles. Obviously, for some topics there will be more material than for others. So for some topics you will need to do more searching; for other topics, you will need to be more careful and discerning as you choose between sources. Look far and wide and be inventive in thinking about good sources.
- In some cases, the article may already have a number of references, either in the article itself, or perhaps somewhere in its talkpage archives. You should take account of these, but you should still undertake your own search, not least to find new material that has not been considered before.
- To figure out what you need, you will also have to look at your article and consider what it is missing, what needs to be improved, where it could do with better sources, etc. In other words, you will have to start planning how you are going to work on and rewrite the article.
- Come up with a final short list of c. 2-4 books and perhaps 6-24 articles.
- Put the long list (of all the sources you have found) as well as the short list (of the sources you have decided are the most important) on your article's talk page by Wednesday, January 20.
- Distribute the sources among the members of your group. Each person should be reading the equivalent of one full book or six articles. Exceptionally long books may be divided up between group members.
- Read the sources, bearing in mind the information that is going to be useful as you work on the article. Think about what it covers and take a note of particular page numbers.
- Produce an annotated bibliography of the sources you have read. This will consist of a summary or précis of the most important aspects of the texts, which should be at least 150 words long for each article read; 600 words for each book. You should put this on your user page by Monday, February 8.
To coordinate with the other members of your group (whose names you can find here), use their talk pages. Each time that you log in to Wikipedia, you will notice that if you have a message waiting for you, there will be a yellow banner at the top of the page.
Good luck! --jbmurray (talk • contribs) 23:09, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
I'm looking forward to working with your class during the semester - if you have any questions about the project or Wikipedia in general, please feel free to leave me a note at User talk:Awadewit. Wikipedians are here to help you! Awadewit (talk) 23:28, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
Hello Raluca edit
Hi there,
Tessa here. I know you had trouble figuring out how to add to the bibliography for our article. If you go to the Miguel Angel Asturias page, then go to the "discussion" tab up top. you can look for the "new section" tab also at the top of the page. This is where you write in your contributions and save. If you have any other questions about wiki i'm happy to help. I think we should try to get together as soon as possible and make a game plan for our article. See you on friday,
--Trowan (talk) 23:13, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
hey, just wanted to let you know that you only have to do a bibliography for 1 book (600 words) or 6 articles (150/each). i wrote on the asturias discussion page what book i have chosen, so has alanna. let me know if you have any questions. --Trowan (talk) 20:02, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
yo, i'm working on the language section right now. do you have a lot more to add or can i go ahead and add on. i have lots of material but only from one book so it would be good to work together. let me know --Trowan (talk) 06:25, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
i saw that you added a couple things to the language section. if you have anything to add on to any of the existing sections then please go ahead. i basically wrote everything in politics, maya influence, use of language, and surrealism/magical realism sections so there are only the references from my 1 book. if you have anything to add on to them while keeping the coherency and style of the sections, go for it. david made the theme sections on nature and identity and there isn't very much in either section, plus i think the writing style needs some work so go ahead and work on that. good luck. i'm no longer working on it so....have fun.