Raj2991

October 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Bang Bang! has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Bang Bang! was changed by Raj2991 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.93553 on 2014-10-08T11:17:53+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:17, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of highest-grossing Bollywood films may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• | {{INR}}{{formatnum:1800000000}}+ ({{INR}}{{formatnum:2400000000+}}according to leading Bollywood entertainment websites <ref>http://

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:39, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Raj2991, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Raj2991! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:26, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

List of highest-grossing Bollywood films

I reverted your edits there. Please restore what you wish but not content with the heading:

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ COPYRIGHT WARNING ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

   | PURSUANT TO ADVICE FROM THE WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION'S ATTORNEY         |
   | we are not able to include a list of top grossing films here        |
   | until we receive permission from Box Office India, which            |
   | is being negotiated.                                                |
   |                                                                     |
   | Please do not add this list, as it may result in the page being     |
   | locked completely to prevent edits or your access to your account   |
   | being suspended.                                                    |
   |                                                                     |
   | Please take any questions about this to the article's talk page.    |

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ COPYRIGHT WARNING ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Also, I notice that if you disagree with others, you tend to simply continue to revert back and forth. A better way is to discuss things at the article talk. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page—whether involving the same or different material—within a 24-hour period.

Thank you.

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 15:50, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

November 2014

Hello, I'm Seahorseruler. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Bang Bang!  with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Seahorseruler ^{(Talk Page) (Contribs)} 02:03, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Hi, you did it again. I am having trouble understanding. You've removed what seems to be a lot of the exact same sourced content without explaining why. Please explain so we can understand, and possibly agree. Many thanks. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 06:07, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Bang Bang!, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 19:47, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Explanation and suggestion

You posted at my talk page "...With reference to your message,I was editing the "Bang Bang!" page because the collections by BOX office India is erroneous.I was publishing the box office collections results as quoted by leading Trade magazines such as Koimoi....follow the link: http://www.indicine.com/movies/bollywood/controversial-box-office-collections-of-krrish-3-our-take/ ...to find out the errors of BOX office India.Hence,I believe actual box office collections should be quoted instead of blindly following the controversial figures of Box office India... "

I understand. I did not revert because I disagreed with the new way the section looked. I reverted because you did not use an edit summary to explain why you removed sourced content. It is hard to figure out when you look at that section. One needs to look carefully and examine sources. Your version may be best. I still do not know.

The best plan is for you to use edit summaries. If your edit is reverted, then use the talk page to explain further why your version is best. It is important not to simply revert again and again in order to have the version you want. I explained that in the post above, and you can see it happening now regarding this edit you keep trying to produce. Many thanks for your understanding. If you still do not understand, please ask and we will all help. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:43, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Bang Bang!

Please see: Talk:Bang Bang!#Box office section.

Thank you. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:37, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

I found a thread saying that Boxofficeindia is a reliable source. Please feel free to comment at Talk:Bang Bang!#Box office section instead of warring. Thank you. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:59, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)