Raineywebtech
Welcome!
Hello, Raineywebtech, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!
Please be aware that the subjects of articles on Wikipedia do not have editorial control over those articles. Our encyclopedia entries are bound by our rules about neutrality, verifiability, and notability. We strive to make sure that there is not defamatory content in our articles, and if you find negative content that is not reliably sourced you are welcome to request its removal; however, you may not remove (or comment out) sourced content from articles simply because it is content that you or the article subject doesn't like. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 18:07, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
Rule and Swart and stuff edit
(This topic was mentioned in conversation, and I decided to look into it. Just so you know why I'm involved.)
Okay. Now, I understand completely that Ms Rule is not happy about having this content in the article about her. But the thing is, this is going to be an issue. If it's excluded from the article completely, then we will keep getting people who have no idea that there was a dispute regarding its inclusion... they'll read the article, notice that the Swart mess isn't mentioned, and decide "oh! I should add the Swart mess to the article!"
and then Ms Rule will get upset all over again.
Now, based on the content of what Mr Swart wrote for the Weekly, it's pretty obvious what Ms Rule is upset about. But here's the thing, y'see: based on Mr Swart's behavior, this is blowing up into a much bigger story than just his nasty criticism of her.
So what I'm gonna do is, I'm gonna reintegrate the stuff about Mr Swart's criticism, and then I'm gonna add the details that will, to many readers, cast doubt on the validity of the criticism. I'm not gonna say that his criticism is invalid; that'd be passing judgment, and I'm being neutral. I'm just gonna show the truth (Swart subsequently admitted that he was romantically involved with Northton, and that he had not mentioned this to the Weekly's editors because he did not feel it was relevant; the Weekly's editors announced that they would be triple-checking all of Swart's statements; Rule is pursuing legal action against Swart) and let the readers make up their own mind about what it means.