Rahid98

Welcome!

Hello, Rahid98! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Devokewater (talk) 20:56, 21 November 2020 (UTC) Getting Started Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper) Things to do Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

November 2020

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Graham Hancock. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 09:32, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Doug Weller. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Deism, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 16:40, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Doug Weller talk 16:41, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision diffs
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Doug Weller talk 12:15, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

"he serMinister to France, the first US poirst U.S. Misident of Pennsylvania.t posts.r to France"

That's part of your post at Committee of Five. It's gibberish. Between that and your failure to use sources, etc, I'm not sure you are capable of editing here. Doug Weller talk 16:46, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

December 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for problems with English, changing sourced text, copyright violation, general competence.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Doug Weller talk 16:41, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Your edit to English coffeehouses in the 17th and 18th centuries has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Doug Weller talk 16:41, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Okay, I understand the concern related to the blocking. I will refrain from making unnecessary edits, please at least remove the block or reduce the expiry date of the block from infinity. Rahid98 (talk) 17:44, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

UTRS 40467

This user is requesting unblocking at UTRS appeal #40467 --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:58, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Please consider unblocking Rahid98 (talk) 19:35, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

UTRS appeal #40467 has been declined. I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time.

We do not edit at the behest of the subjects of articles, especially when the request is to legitimatize pseudoscience.

We presume any content that does not explicitly state a free license to be copyrighted. Please elaborate on this issue on your talk page.

You will need to understand how to contribute constructively without asking each time.

As you still have access to your talk page, and as there is no private information associated with your appeal, please post your unblock request to your user talk page for administrator review. Place the following at the bottom of your talk page, filling in "Your reason here".

 {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. 

Thank you for your attention to these matters.