User talk:Ragesoss/Archive7

Rachel Carson FAC

You're welcome - I'm glad you didn't think I was being too picky. I started to feel bad when I was the last hold out and writing things like "can you redo this whole paragraph"? Awadewit | talk 02:29, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Shame about tech mo

I'm not feeling very ashamed. The article was restored, was it not? Do you have a source on this reputation that Wikipedia is developing? I would be like to add it to the debate. SolidPlaid 20:34, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

The LA Times article was interesting. Would you like to work with me to influence the debate here on Wikipedia in an anti-deletionist direction? Wikipedians cannot resist a good citation. SolidPlaid 01:28, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Joseph Priestley FAC

I have developed a little list of things "to do" before taking JP to FAC. It is on the talk page. Let me know what you think. Usually this kind of preparation helps avoid disasters such as this. Awadewit | talk 06:56, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

• There is a peer review of JP going on here that you might be interested in. Awadewit | talk 18:59, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

• I could really use your help shaving down the JP article, whenever you have a moment. Thanks. Awadewit | talk 10:46, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Astronomische Nachrichten

I've left a note on the WikiProject talk page, but would you have time to have a look at Astronomische Nachrichten? One thing I am looking for, in addition to more editors, is someone to assess the current state for the WikiProject banners. Would you be able to help out with that? Carcharoth 11:21, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Oklahoma Newsletter October 07

The WikiOkie Reporter WikiProject Oklahoma's Newsletter Issue 2 - October 2007 Edit this newsletter Discuss this newsletter	Your second or third stop for WikiProject Oklahoma News Sign up to receive this newsletter Oklahoma Portal Current article statistics Past issues of this newsletter
Modest boost in assessed articles during September WikiProject Oklahoma's massive list of unassessed articles got smaller over the month of September, as 45 articles were assessed by bots and editors. Assessments made on August 31 bring the total to 62 assessed articles over the 31-day period. On September 15, BetacommandBot assessed 40 articles from no-class to stub and start class. This bot automatically updates the talk pages of articles included in more than one WikiProject if at least one WikiProject has already assessed the material, bringing each interested WikiProject's ratings into compliance with the assessment. No B-class or higher quality assessments were given out over September, and only a small handful of importance assessments were granted. On August 31, one Low, Mid, and High importance rating was given to three separate articles. Leroy McGuirk was given the lone high-importance rating. Oklahoma categories receive help from Texan TexasAndroid, an administrator, assisted WikiProject Oklahoma by categorizing nearly 100 Oklahoma-related pages on September 24. The additions were made mainly to Tulsa-related pages. "I've done the major cities in Texas in the past, and was thinking about what to do next, and decided to stay relatively close to home for now. Thus OK's big cities got done," TexasAndroid wrote on his user page. Meet WikiProject Oklahoma's "sub-project" Taskforce Tulsa, a collaboration of editors operating under WikiProject Oklahoma, has been created to increase the scope of Wikipedia's coverage of Tulsa and its surrounding areas. Taskforce Tulsa is many things, but most importantly, it is a way for editors to have a place to put Tulsa-related requests (pictures, article, expansion, collaboration) for other editors interested in Tulsa. News, guidelines, and category trees related to Tulsa articles can easily be accessed and added through the task force's project page. The taskforce is not its own WikiProject. Instead, it works in conjunction with WikiProject Oklahoma to increase the quality and scope of Tulsa-related material. Because of the increased clutter and unnecessary waste of space that would be created with a new WikiProject, editors have opted for a taskforce, or workgroup project. Rather than having a Wikiproject Oklahoma banner as well as a Wikiproject Tulsa banner on most Tulsa-related pages, editors can simply add the Tulsa Taskforce note onto the existing Wikiproject Oklahoma banner. Cleaner, clearer, and more efficient. In edit mode, such a banner would appear as this: "{{WikiProject Oklahoma|class=FA|importance=Top|tulsa-task-force=yes}}". In other words, simply adding "tulsa-task-force=yes}}" to the existing Wikiproject Oklahoma banner on an article's talk page would include that article into the Tulsa Task Force. According to an explanation on the taskforce's project page, "The Tulsa Task Force is a 'sub-wikiproject' operating 'beneath' Wikiproject Oklahoma, and is designed to assist it by focusing specifically on Tulsa-related material. Editors who are interested in expanding knowledge of Tulsa on Wikipedia may wish to consider themselves part of Taskforce Tulsa as well as Wikiproject Oklahoma." Interested parties can sign up much like a stand-alone WikiProject.
This month's task: Get out of your routine. Make some edits! • Edit next month's newsletter
The WikiProject Oklahoma newsletter is a work in progress so please share your ideas about how the newsletter can be improved. If you no longer wish to receive this newsletter, please remove your name from the sign-up list.

This newsletter was delivered to you by Okiefromokla. This is a one-time delivery as to all Wikiproject Oklahoma members to boost interest in the newsletter. In the future, if you would like to receive this newsletter in your talk page, please insert your name in the sign-up list. Thanks!

DYK

On 9 October, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ernest Baldwin, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

---- Anonymous Dissident^Talk 09:19, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XVII - October 2007

The October 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot -- 09:51, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia Weekly Episode 32

Great news! Wikipedia Weekly Episode 32 has been released!

.mp3 and .ogg versions can be found at http://wikipediaweekly.org/2007/10/09/episode-32-trust-me/, and, as always, you can download past episodes and leave comments at http://wikipediaweekly.com/.

For Wikipedia Weekly — WODUP 08:35, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

You are receiving this message because you are listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery.
If you do not wish to receive such notifications, please remove yourself from the list.

Saturday November 3, 2007 New York City Meetup

You have expressed interest in creating a meta:Wikimedia New York City. Please have a look at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC, the meetup for Saturday November 3, 2007, where it is hoped we can actually get a local chapter started.--Pharos 07:14, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia Weekly

A couple new episodes - we're posting the infobox to save duplicating info.

Wikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaWeekly

Wiki Loves Monuments

Fuzheado, Gamaliel, Effeietsanders, Nikikana, LilyOfTheWest, and SuperHamster discuss the annual Wiki Loves Monuments worldwide photography contest

---

Onsite · Offsite
Subscription · Feedback

For the podcast crew -- Tawkerbot 20:29, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

pick a journal ... any journal

Hi, could you pick an old journal in a field that you are familiar with for a future collaboration project; enter it under "Nominations for future CotW:" in Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Academic_Journals#Planning_ahead. Thanks, John Vandenberg 01:38, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Priestley queries

There are a couple of questions that could use your expert knowledge at the Priestley PR. Just search for your username - hopefully you will find them all. Thanks. Awadewit | talk 20:21, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

• A few more. So sorry! JP is really shaping up, I think. A few more weeks and we can submit it to FAC, I think. Awadewit | talk 08:32, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia Weekly Episode 33

Great news! Wikipedia Weekly Episode 33 has been released!

.mp3 and .ogg versions can be found at http://wikipediaweekly.org/2007/10/26/wikipedia-weeekly-30/, and, as always, you can download past episodes and leave comments at http://wikipediaweekly.com/.

For Wikipedia Weekly — WODUP ^(?) 07:39, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

You are receiving this message because you are listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery.
If you do not wish to receive such notifications, please remove yourself from the list.

SVG drawers

Hi, you say on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chemistry/Structure drawing workgroup "RasMol, experimenting with new SVG-output drawers" What kind of output do you get with RasMol? The reason that I ask, is that I used PyMol to draw a 3D structure lately, and I couldn't convince it to draw a distributed negative charge like on Image:Chromium(II)-acetate-dimer-3D-balls.png. Can one manage that in RasMol?

Regards, --Slashme 20:39, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

(re reply on my talk page) OK, thanks! --Slashme 23:20, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to WikiProject History

Hey Ragesoss, welcoem to WikiProject History. You look like you'll be a valuable asset :-DD--Phoenix-wiki (talk · contribs) 12:22, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Priestley FAC

Markus Poessel has dropped a few more queries at the Priestley peer review. If you could handle those, I would appreciate it. I wrote a one-sentence definition of phlogiston theory for the article, but stumbled over the explanation of "dephlogisticated air" a bit. Perhaps you could add something on that? It seems like it would be nice to explain that name. I am going to proofread the article today and tomorrow. I am hoping to submit it to FAC in the next day or two. Awadewit | talk 04:25, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

• See discussion at User talk:WillowW#JP regarding when the law of conservation of mass was formulated. Thanks. Awadewit | talk 04:52, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XVIII - November 2007

The November 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot -- 15:49, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Hi from John Horgan

Sage, not sure this is gonna reach you, but I just checked for and found the noticed Wiki message you sent me so I thought I'd try to write you. Great meeting you at HSS. I mean it about pursuing journalism instead of academia, although they're not mutually exclusive. Thanks for the advice about my Wiki bio. From now on if I have problems with my page (which as I said has obviously been edited by the mathematician David Hoffman, who's been an ardent hater of mine since my Sci Am published my "Death of Proof" article), I'll complain thruough the proper channels. John —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jhorgan (talk • contribs) 18:06, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

rating system

Well, I've long been bemused by the rating systems, not just disagreeing with the results, but with the structure. How much sense does it make to have A-Qual articles at 0.5-2.0% of the total number? It has the consequence that far too many are graded B, and that B covers far too wide a range of quality. Should not grades in any system bear some vague relation to a normal distribution unless there is some cogent counter-argument? At present Hist/Sci has only two articles in grade A; there are more in FA!

Related to that is the strange GA and FA, which come in on another dimension, yet end up on the same ladder; and the curious connection between fame of subject and status of article. But I would be happy to see some sensible redress of the A-Qual proportion to, say 5-8% of total. Macdonald-ross 15:01, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your support.

Remember, remember, the fifth of November? Thank you to everyone who participated in my Request for adminship, which was successful at 50/5/0 on November 5th, 2007. It became, as you may know, rather contentious toward the end (though fortunately no gunpowder was involved), and I appreciate the work of other Wikipedians to keep it focused. --Thespian 02:23, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia Weekly Episode 34

zOMG! Wikipedia Weekly Episode 34 has been released, and it's the biggest panel in quite a while!

.mp3 and .ogg versions can be found at http://wikipediaweekly.org/2007/11/03/wikipedia-weekly-34-aka-fundraiser/, and, as always, you can download past episodes and leave comments at http://wikipediaweekly.com/.

For Wikipedia Weekly — WODUP 05:15, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

You are receiving this message because you are listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery.
If you do not wish to receive such notifications, please remove yourself from the list.

OhanaUnited's RfA

Thanks for voting at my RfA. Unfortunately, the result stands at 51 support, 21 oppose and 7 neutral which means that I did not succeed. As many expressed their appreciation of my works in featured portals during my RfA, I will fill up the vacuum position of director in featured portal candidates to maintain the standards of featured contents in addition to my active role in Good articles. Have a great day. OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 03:54, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

SPOV NPOV

Hello Ragesoss:

I saw your question to all the ArbCom candidates. I'm reading the answers with interest.

Reason I'm here is to ask what inspired the question. Is there a particular debate/argument where the question of SPOV vs NPOV figures strongly?

The discussion at Homeopathy referred to SPOV a few times. This is what started me wondering about it.

I think you may get a prize for asking the toughest question - meaning the one most poorly answered.

Cheers, Wanderer57 04:24, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

scientists

he, he thanks.[1]

I recently edited Pheromones, so I am in "scientist mode" I guess. Thanks. Travb (talk) 02:15, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

I was just about to add the exact same book on Andrew_Dickson_White. When I realized another editor had added another book. Then after I formated that book, I realized it was the same book I was going to add. :) [2] Have a good evening. Travb (talk) 03:28, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Request re ArbCom Question

Hello Ragesoss:

I'm asking a favour of you. If there are more candidates for ArbCom in the next week, can you and will you please paste in my question as well as your own?

The complete text of my question is HERE.

I'm asking as I will be away and I would like all candidates to be asked. There may not be any more candidates. I have given the question to Thebainer and all earlier candidates.

Thank you. Wanderer57 15:18, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

PS I'll advise you when I return.

PPS I'm still thinking about a answer to your question and hope to have one for you.

Hi. Me again.

I apologize for asking. I probably should have realized that it would not be cricket to do what I asked.

Best wishes, Wanderer57 16:39, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia Weekly Episode 35

Let us rejoyce! Wikipedia Weekly Episode 35 has been released!

.mp3 and .ogg versions can be found at http://wikipediaweekly.org/2007/11/11/episode-35-secretly-famous/, and, as always, you can download past episodes and leave comments at http://wikipediaweekly.com/.

For Wikipedia Weekly — WODUP 01:35, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

You are receiving this message because you are listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery.
If you do not wish to receive such notifications, please remove yourself from the list.

DYK

On 11 November, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Darwin Industry, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

—Wknight94 (talk) 16:56, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Neutral theory of molecular evolution

I've added two refs, one of which (Provine) I'm unsure how to fit into the template. It's a named section within a joint paper. I'm hoping someone more clued-up will know what to do with it! Macdonald-ross 15:36, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Apologies

I have finally gotten around to commenting on your essay. I placed my thoughts on the talk page of the draft itself. I hope that was ok. Awadewit | talk 03:31, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia Weekly Episode 36

Hey! Wikipedia Weekly Episode 36 has been released!

.mp3 and .ogg versions can be found at http://wikipediaweekly.org/2007/11/30/wikipedia-weekly-36/, and, as always, you can download past episodes and leave comments at http://wikipediaweekly.com/.

For Wikipedia Weekly — WODUP 04:11, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

You are receiving this message because you are listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery.
If you do not wish to receive such notifications, please remove yourself from the list.

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XIX - December 2007

The December 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by KevinalewisBot -- 12:30, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

History of evolutionary thought FAC

I have gone ahead and nominated History of evolutionary thought for FA. Your participation in the process would be appreciated.Rusty Cashman (talk) 06:46, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

I went to rev the del on the history of biology after discussing the problem of the wording (it really is a tricky turn of phrase), but you had already done it! ;) Thanks for that! --AmandaEP (talk) 04:51, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

If you want something done, ask a busy person

Wow, looks like you're the busiest person on WP! I'm ashamed to come for help after doing almost nil on HoS since "The Ballad of Gresham College", but you did say to ask if I ever needed access to an article... I'm after "Obituary: Yvonne Vera (1964-2005)", Primorac The Journal of Commonwealth Literature.2005; 40: 149-152, just to check whether, and on what authority, Vera's death was given as AIDS-related. If you're otherwise occupied, not to worry! Hope all's going well, and, ahem, do have a break over Xmas... JackyR | Talk 18:35, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

And lightning service too! You're the best! JackyR | Talk 18:20, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Your Paper

Well Done on your Wiki Paper. It seems that you are unaware of a similar project. the details are at [3] -- Historian of Science & the Philosophy of Science sympathetic to your cause 129.94.117.165 (talk) 22:35, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Also, FYI, unlike USA, and US English, in Australia an "Associate Professor" is a very high ranking academic. 129.94.117.165 (talk) 22:39, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia Weekly Episodes 37 and 38

Well, gee whiz! I don't check WP:WEEKLY for a few days and look what happens: I miss two new episodes. Nonetheless, Wikipedia Weekly Episode 37 and Episode 38 have been released!

.mp3 and .ogg versions can be found at http://wikipediaweekly.org/2007/12/10/wikipedia-weekly-37-rundown/ and http://wikipediaweekly.org/2007/12/14/episode-38-interview-wbrianna-laugher/, and, as always, you can download past episodes and leave comments at http://wikipediaweekly.com/.

For Wikipedia Weekly — WODUP 02:05, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

You are receiving this message because you are listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery.
If you do not wish to receive such notifications, please remove yourself from the list.

Wikipedia Weekly Episode 39

Wikipedia Weekly Episode 39 has been released!

.mp3 and .ogg versions can be found at http://wikipediaweekly.org/2007/12/18/episode-39-knol-pointer/, and, as always, you can download past episodes and leave comments at http://wikipediaweekly.com/.

For Wikipedia Weekly — WODUP 06:20, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

You are receiving this message because you are listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery.
If you do not wish to receive such notifications, please remove yourself from the list.

Greetings from the US National Arboretum

Good Morning Ragesoss:

My name is LaDaryl Scott. I am the Information Receptionist at the US National Arboretum. I am writing you to let you know that almost all your photos of our bonsai show the back sides of the trees. These photos were taken on a day when the trees had been rotated. Jim Hughes, the curator of the National Bonsai & Penjing Museum, would like to update your pictures. Please give me a call at (202) 245-4523, or you can contact Jim at (202) 245-5307.

BTW, you took some very nice pictures! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Scottypimpin75 (talk • contribs) 14:07, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

AMNH tour

We need to get a preliminary head-count for the AMNH tour happening before the meet-up. If you think you would like to go, please sign up at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC#AMHN tour sign-up. Thanks! ScienceApologist (talk) 02:53, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Seasons Greetings

Wishing you the very best for the season - Guettarda 05:47, 25 December 2007 (UTC)