Your submission at Articles for creation: Earth’s two versions (December 17) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (barksniff) 12:29, 17 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, RafizadehTO100P! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (barksniff) 12:29, 17 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Help me! edit

Please help me with...Good morning. I am RafizadehTO100P and have two questions. 1) I have submitted two articles, but can only see one. How can I see both? 2) The article that I am currently seeing is in Sandbox. How do I clear and reset the Sandbox so I can work on another article?

RafizadehTO100P (talk) 14:47, 19 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

There's a sandbox at User:RafizadehTO100P/sandbox and a draft at Draft:Earth’s two versions. Special:MyContributions will show all of your contributions, with different filters to look at pages created, recent edits, etc. If you want to create a new page, you're welcome to use the Article wizard to create a draft, or feel free to create a second sandbox. If you go to User:RafizadehTO100P/sandbox 2, it's currently a redlinked/nonexistent page, but you can create it there (or any name that you put in [[square brackets]]. If you want more help, change the {{help me-helped}} back into a {{help me}}, stop by the Teahouse, or Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Primefac (talk) 14:59, 19 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
Rather than create sandboxes, I recommend a Help:userspace draft when you're trying to start a new article. This gives the draft a more useful name than "sandbox". Use sandboxes for experimentation and such; use drafts for drafts. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 15:05, 19 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
Please have a look at your sandbox again. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:06, 19 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

FRINGE edit

In looking at your two drafts, my impression is that you are writing about topics that mainstream science would consider fringe, for which there are some policies at FRINGE that you may want to make yourself aware of. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 15:13, 19 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Earth’s two versions (January 19) edit

 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by ToBeFree was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Wikipedia is not a publisher of Fringe theories and original research. Wikipedia is a tertiary source that summarizes what reliable secondary sources say about a topic. To challenge this decision, you need to prove that the term "Two versions of earth" is more than a neologism and science-fiction novel topic.
~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:26, 19 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Conflict of Interest in references edit

In the drafts you are preparing, the name of one of the authors of a book you are citing is strongly suggestive that you are citing your own work. This represents a sort of conflict of interest that you should at least declare on your user page. Adding references to your own work on Wikipedia is often taken as a sign of promotionalism or REFSPAM. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 19:25, 20 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Dear jmcgnh, thanks for guidance and insightful comments. The submitted articles are not fringe as evidenced by references. They represent the mainstream view of theories of Earth’s glacial and interglacial conditions. Current Wikipedia articles on glacial and interglacial Earth lack comprehensive and coherent coverage of Earth’s glacial and interglacial conditions. The submitted articles remove that deficiency and provide a compact, comprehensive and encyclopedic view of Earth’s glacial and interglacial conditions based on the latest available information. There is no conflict of interest as my work is a small part of the knowledge base of Earth’s glacial and interglacial conditions. Best. RafizadehTO100P (talk) 20:36, 20 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

New message from ToBeFree edit

 
Hello, RafizadehTO100P. You have new messages at ToBeFree's talk page.
Message added 20:39, 20 January 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:39, 20 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Deletion done edit

Hi RafizadehTO100P,

As requested, the pages have been deleted. To restore them, you can always ask at WP:REFUND.

Feel free to remove this message; feel free to remove any messages you like to remove from this page. You may always do so.

If there are any questions left, feel free to ask for independent advice at the Teahouse, or on my talk page.

Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:15, 21 January 2020 (UTC)Reply