Removal of speedy deletion tags

edit

Please do no remove speedy deletion tags unless you intend to assert the notability of the article's subject. NOne of the articles assert sufficient notability to conform to the standards for biograhical articles. Thanks, Caknuck 08:50, 14 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

as the reviewing administrator, I deleted the article the article for there being no show of notability that migt possibly meet BLP.This is not a personal reflection, but just saying that this is after all an encyclopedia, and you need to have done something truly significant in public life, besides being an advisor in a relatively routine way. If you can show it, and give some published source that supports it, feel fre to recreate the article.

I note that the articles on your relatives have even less justification for being encyclopedia notable, and have also been removed. Sorry about that, but it was inevitable. DGG (talk) 13:39, 14 November 2007 (UTC)Reply


Notability of Samjhana Baral

edit

A tag has been placed on Samjhana Baral requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Caknuck 18:40, 14 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Birth of Nepal

edit
 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Birth of Nepal, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://bordernepal.wordpress.com/2007/03/13/the-birth-of-nepal. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 06:44, 16 December 2007 (UTC)Reply


Nepal army involved UN Missions

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Nepal army involved UN Missions, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Ice Cold Beer (talk) 07:31, 24 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

?????

edit

Hello Rabindra:

I'm curious about the purpose of the ??????? tags you are putting on the Mexico article and other country articles. Please, what do they do?

Thank you, Wanderer57 (talk) 17:10, 11 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Chitwan Valley

edit
 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Chitwan Valley, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Chitwan Valley. NimiTize 18:24, 18 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

  Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Battle of Pauwa Gadhi against Captain Kinloch. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. --Allen3 talk 15:24, 21 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

  Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to First Nepal - Tibet War. The article seems to be taken verbatim from http://nepalarmy.mil.np/organisation/images/history.pdf. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. -- -- Wormcast (talk) 00:34, 23 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit
 

Hello. Concerning your contribution, First Nepal - Tibet , please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://nepalarmy.mil.np/organisation/images/history.pdf. As a copyright violation, First Nepal - Tibet appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. First Nepal - Tibet has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:First Nepal - Tibet and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:First Nepal - Tibet with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:First Nepal - Tibet .

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. --Wormcast (talk) 00:46, 23 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

WP:ANI

edit

You are the subject of a message at WP:ANI concerning your frequent uploading of copyright material. Please see the discussion here.

Please note that the uploading of copyrighted material, especially after multiple notices and warnings, is a very serious offense. JodyB talk 17:48, 23 December 2008 (UTC)Reply