Welcome! edit

Hello, RaVski, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for recognizing the benefits of becoming a registered user, creating your user/talk page, and your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you need help, check out useful resources & Getting Help below, ask on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page & add {{Help me}}. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) after your text entry, or by clicking   if shown, in order to produce your username & date. Please always fill in edit summary field with a brief description of your article or talk page edits (optional when just adding your communications on talk pages).
You can practice in your personal sandbox (add {{My Sandbox|replace with your user name}} on your user page for future easy access) or your user page. Masssly —Sadat (Masssly)TCM 00:41, 10 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Sadat (Masssly)TCM 00:41, 10 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

RaVski, you are invited to the Teahouse edit

 

Hi RaVski! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Ushau97 (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:09, 10 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

LGBT adoption - Slovenia edit

Hi, can you give me any reason why you have deleted Slovenia from the LGBT adoption page and map? There was a link to a decent online publication (see p. 198/199 there), and on the talk page I had also referred to a paper source (German legal journal). So, there should be a good explanation for deletion of Slovenia. Sigur (talk) 13:48, 16 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

http://www.ontopmag.com/article.aspx?id=11341 RaVski (talk) 16:10, 16 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
Yep. Exactly: My source said that the legislation and case law prior to the failed Family Code already allows gay stepchild adoption: "The decision is considered to be a landmark case, showing that the existing legislation adopted 35 years ago already allows for second-parent adoption, and that this procedure will remain accessible for same-sex partners even if the Family Code, which contains specific provisions allowing second-parent adoption, does not enter into force." (page 199, 2nd para., last sentence [1]). Your source - quite correctly - says that the draft Family Code was voted down. My source says that even in that case gay stepchild adoption remains possible. Thus the conclusion remains that Slovenia needs to be in the list. Sigur (talk) 19:01, 16 April 2014 (UTC) (And in case you weren't aware that your source talks about the Family Code, see "Slovenian Family Code referendum, 2012"; you can verify there that the dates match. Sigur (talk) 19:44, 16 April 2014 (UTC))Reply
OK, I carefully checked your source and you are right. I made changes on these pages: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_adoption https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_adoption_in_Europe https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_rights_in_Europe and on the map. Thank you very much for the information.