Welcome!

edit

Hello, RLINDUSTRY, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome.  Atlantic306 (talk) 01:59, 20 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

April 2021

edit

  Hello, I'm Rdp060707. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to Valley (band) because they seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. ----Rdp060707|talk 01:34, 28 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Baker's Secret (May 21)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Spicy were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Spicy (talk) 06:31, 21 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, RLINDUSTRY! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Spicy (talk) 06:31, 21 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: RL Industry Company Limited (May 21)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Nearlyevil665 were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
nearlyevil665 07:06, 21 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Baker's Secret

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Baker's Secret, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. LOMRJYO(talkcontrib) 07:41, 21 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: RL Industry Company Limited (May 21)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 08:56, 21 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

May 2021

edit
 
Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of name and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:

  • Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
  • Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
  • Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Cabayi (talk) 09:13, 21 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Draft:RL Industry Company Limited

edit
 

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Draft:RL Industry Company Limited has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Cabayi (talk) 09:13, 21 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Unblock Request

edit
 
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

RLINDUSTRY (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

The reason I am here is that recently my account has been blocked indefinitely because my account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Firstly, I would like to give my most sincere apology because Wikipedia should be a place where editors share knowledge for a common good. Secondly, I just want to clarify that I do not receive or expect to receive any compensation for any of my contributions to Wikipedia. I do not have any relationship with any clients or employers, and I do not receive payment for any of my edits or actions on the English Wikipedia. Thirdly, I would like to change my username because my current username is against the username policy of Wikipedia. To ensure my fair and neutral representation, I would like to request a change of name in order to make a useful contribution in future editing. Fourthly, I would like to kindly ask for a second chance for unblocking my account because I truly understand the mistakes I have made. During this self-reflection period of time, I learn that my wordings in my previous edits are biased. I shouldn't use adverbs and adjectives that distract the audiences from a neutral point of view. Moreover, in my previous edits, I added unnecessary information about the page that may have turned the page into an advertisement rather than an encyclopedia. Me as an editor, I have the responsibility to present the truth and the correct summary of knowledge. The mistakes I made this time taught me a valuable lesson that helped me to understand what my weaknesses are in editings and become a more responsible editor. I will not repeat the kind of edits for what I was blocked. If I am granted a precious second chance, upholding the faith in truth and a fair attitude will be my highest priority, I will use this opportunity to make a useful contribution to Wikipedia, also edit pages to bring new insights and correct information to audiences. Therefore, I hope you would grant me a second chance to correct what I did and use my ability to make Wikipedia a better platform for providing reference work or summaries of knowledge. RLINDUSTRY (talk) 17:14, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Despite your claim to the contrary, I have determined you do indeed have a specific relationship with RL Industry Co Ltd. As you have attempted to deceive us, I have no choice but to decline your unblock request. Yamla (talk) 17:54, 23 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

rename not successful

edit

The chosen username is too similar to an existing username or it used to be username of someone else that got renamed: Erez ephraim. Please choose again. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:55, 23 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Unblock Request

edit
 
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

RLINDUSTRY (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

The reason I am here is that recently my account has been blocked indefinitely because my account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Firstly, I would like to give my most sincere apology because Wikipedia should be a place where editors share knowledge for a common good. Secondly, I just want to clarify that I do not have specific relationship with RL Industry Co Ltd. I do not receive or expect to receive any compensation from them for any of my contributions to Wikipedia. I edited their page just because Baker secret is a bakeware brand all over the world, and Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, I only want to create a page about it and provide information to the readers. Thirdly, I would like to change my username because my current username is against the username policy of Wikipedia. To ensure my fair and neutral representation, I would like to request a change of name in order to make a useful contribution in future editing. Fourthly, I would like to kindly ask for a second chance for unblocking my account because I truly understand the mistakes I have made. During this self-reflection period of time, I learn that my wordings in my previous edits are biased. I shouldn't use adverbs and adjectives that distract the audiences from a neutral point of view. Moreover, in my previous edits, I added unnecessary information about the page that may have turned the page into an advertisement rather than an encyclopedia. Me as an editor, I have the responsibility to present the truth and the correct summary of knowledge. The mistakes I made this time taught me a valuable lesson that helped me to understand what my weaknesses are in editings and become a more responsible editor. I will not repeat the kind of edits for what I was blocked. If I am granted a precious second chance, upholding the faith in truth and a fair attitude will be my highest priority, I will use this opportunity to make a useful contribution to Wikipedia, also edit pages to bring new insights and correct information to audiences. Therefore, I hope you would grant me a second chance to correct what I did and use my ability to make Wikipedia a better platform for providing reference work or summaries of knowledge. RLINDUSTRY (talk) 17:08, 25 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

I'm curious as to your choice of new username, are you the same person who made the previous request? Assuming you are- as long as you continue to deny that you have any connection to RL Industry(I have also determined that), there is no pathway forward here. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 17:18, 25 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Unblock Request

edit
 
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

RLINDUSTRY (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

The reason I am here is that recently my account has been blocked indefinitely because my account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Firstly, I would like to give my most sincere apology because Wikipedia should be a place where editors share knowledge for a common good. Secondly, I just want to clarify that I do not have a specific relationship with RL Industry Co Ltd. I do not receive or expect to receive any compensation from them for any of my contributions to Wikipedia. I edited their page just because Baker secret is a bakeware brand all over the world, and Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, I only want to create a page about it and provide information to the readers. Thirdly, I would like to change my username because my current username is against the username policy of Wikipedia. I am still the same person who applied the unblock request three times. My real name, Erez Ephraim is being declined for the rename request due to too similar to an existing username. Therefore, I choose my French friend's name with consent because of the uniqueness of his name and non-one in Wikipedia has used it before. To ensure my fair and neutral representation, I would like to request a change of name to make a useful contribution in future editing. Fourthly, I would like to kindly ask for a second chance for unblocking my account because I truly understand the mistakes I have made. During this self-reflection period of time, I learn that my wordings in my previous edits are biased. I shouldn't use adverbs and adjectives that distract the audiences from a neutral point of view. Moreover, in my previous edits, I added unnecessary information about the page that may have turned the page into an advertisement rather than an encyclopedia. Me as an editor, I have the responsibility to present the truth and the correct summary of knowledge. The mistakes I made this time taught me a valuable lesson that helped me understand my weaknesses in editings and become a more responsible editor. I will not repeat the kind of edits for what I was blocked. If I am granted a precious second chance, upholding the faith in truth and a fair attitude will be my highest priority, I will use this opportunity to make a useful contribution to Wikipedia, also edit pages to bring new insights and correct information to audiences. Therefore, I hope you would grant me a second chance to correct what I did and use my ability to make Wikipedia a better platform for providing reference work or summaries of knowledge.RLINDUSTRY (talk) 01:24, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

A cut-and-paste appeal deserves a cut-and-paste reply. "I'm curious as to your choice of new username, are you the same person who made the previous request? Assuming you are- as long as you continue to deny that you have any connection to RL Industry(I have also determined that), there is no pathway forward here. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 17:18, 25 May 2021 (UTC)" Cabayi (talk) 12:34, 27 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Since you repeated the same request verbatim, it's clear you aren't listening to us, so I am removing your access to this page. Your request will remain open, but if (more likely when) it is declined, you will need to use WP:UTRS. Any administrator may restore access if they see a need. 331dot (talk) 09:50, 26 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

And you shouldn't use someone else's name as your username. 331dot (talk) 09:52, 26 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
" I just want to clarify that I do not have a specific relationship with RL Industry Co Ltd" This is easily googled and we can see this is not truthful but instead, a further attempt to mislead us. --Yamla (talk) 10:30, 26 May 2021 (UTC)Reply