Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 20)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 22:51, 20 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

RGomc, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi RGomc! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Samwalton9 (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniel and Geo Fuchs (March 28)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Atlantic306 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Atlantic306 (talk) 20:42, 28 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

References

edit

Hi, the references need to be inline citations with a References section not web links section, all references should be in the same section whether they are newspapers, books, or websites. I didn't mean your weblinks were unreliable but they need to be properly formatted with inline citations and also more references are needed so that every fact can be checked by the reader in the references. Help with inline citations is given in the WP:Referencing for beginners section. Thanks, Atlantic306 (talk),

Thank you very muchRGomc (talk) 18:27, 20 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Will do...Thanks alot for all your help, very much appreciated!!!!RGomc (talk) 23:51, 20 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniel and Geo Fuchs has been accepted

edit
 
Daniel and Geo Fuchs, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Atlantic306 (talk) 02:30, 21 April 2017 (UTC)Reply