R&J Fan

January 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Richard & Judy's New Position, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Richard & Judy's New Position was changed by R&J Fan (u) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2009-01-16T20:54:12+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 20:54, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Richard & Judy's New Position constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 21:09, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Richard & Judy's New Position

Thanks for all the work you have put into the Richard & Judy's New Position article. However, I have to tell you that there a number of serious problems with it that you need to fix.

First of all, many of the formatting choices you have made are not to Wikipedia's manual of style. Wikipedia tries to have all its articles looking the same, and your use of bold in particular is non-standard.

Secondly; you use quite a few quotes but don't cite any of them. The contents of articles in Wikipedia need to be verifiable, otherwise they are liable to be removed.

Please don't add a 'Tonights show' section with advice of how and when to 'tune in'. Wikipedia is not a newspaper or TV guide.

You should learn how to use Wikipedia links links rather than weblinks. Also, how to cite rather than just add external links.

The "Stand Out Moments So Far & Notable Guests" section appears to be entirely your own opinion. Wikipedia calls this original research and it is not permitted. For a guest to be particularly notable it has to be the opinion of other, significant people and cited. Your opinion is not enough.

Adding a plug for the Book Club website with prices makes the article look like an advert. Advertising is not permitted.

The biography section "provided by Watch" is a copyright violation. You are not permitted to just copy text off other websites that are copyrighted.

I hope this doesn't put you off. But there are policies and rules you need to learn and follow in Wikipedia in order to write the perfect article. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 23:10, 16 January 2009 (UTC)