User talk:Qwertyxp2000/Archives/2015/February

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Your submission at Articles for creation: LavaMind (February 7)

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sam Sailor was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:LavaMind and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- Sam ^Sing! 14:51, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi there, Im TeaLover1996, I love working on and with computers also I write websites with HTML & JavaScript, I guess you could say Im a nerd like you :) Hope to chat soon -- TeaLover1996 Lets talk about it 11:48, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

How to properly nominate an article for improvement

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

https://www.google.com/search?num=100&safe=off&site=&source=hp&q=how+do+I+nominate+a+wikipedia+article+for+improvement&oq=how+do+I+nominate+a+wikipedia+article+for+improvement&gs_l=hp.3...1278.10842.0.11705.68.52.4.6.6.1.328.6537.11j32j4j1.48.0.msedr...0...1c.1.62.hp..24.44.5034.0.fRrgCPhc3Ug -- Does not tell you how to format. Nor does any search of wikipedia. While I don't mind being chided, I did search extensively before on how to do it right. It might be helpful to create something that is more easily locatable, rather than telling people after the fact. Khallus Maximus (talk) 23:10, 28 February 2015 (UTC)