Welcome to Wikipedia from the Medicine WikiProject! edit

Welcome to Wikipedia and WikiProject Medicine

Welcome to Wikipedia from WikiProject Medicine (also known as WPMED).

We're a group of editors who strive to improve the quality of medical articles here on Wikipedia. I noticed that you are interested in editing medical articles; it's great to have a new editor on board. In your wiki-voyages, a few things that may be relevant to editing Wikipedia articles are:

  • Thanks for coming aboard! We always appreciate a new editor. Feel free to leave us a message at any time on our talk page. If you are interested in joining the project yourself, there is a participant list where you can sign up. Please leave a message on the WPMED talk page if you have any problems, suggestions, would like review of an article, need suggestions for articles to edit, or would like some collaboration when editing!
  • Sourcing of medical and health-related content on Wikipedia is guided by our medical sourcing guidelines, commonly referred to as MEDRS. These guidelines typically require recent secondary sources to support information; their application is further explained here. Primary sources (case studies, case reports, research studies) are rarely used, especially if the primary sources are produced by the organisation or individual who is promoting a claim.
  • The Wikipedia community includes a wide variety of editors with different interests, skills, and knowledge. We all manage to get along through a lot of discussion that happens under the scenes and through the bold, revert, discuss editing cycle. If you encounter any problems, you can discuss them on an article's talk page or post a message on the WPMED talk page.

Feel free to drop a note on my talk page if you have any questions. I wish you all the best on your wiki voyages! Bon courage (talk) 09:46, 31 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Conflict of interest? edit

I have raised a query about your editing at WP:COIN#Cannabidiol (CBD). Thanks. Bon courage (talk) 10:36, 31 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

October 2022 edit

 
You have been blocked from editing certain areas of the encyclopedia for a period of 72 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Acroterion (talk) 11:33, 31 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
You may not repeatedly hijack disambiguation pages like that. Acroterion (talk) 11:34, 31 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Are you sending the same message to the other protagonists? Or are you banning me for responding to their ill-founded claims? Qualitative CBD Researcher (talk) 11:44, 31 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

  This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, as you did at Cannabidiol, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Acroterion (talk) 11:35, 31 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

You may not use Wikipedia to endorse products as you have done. Please note that undeclared paid editing in favor of a conflict of interest is a violation of Wikipedia policy. Please declare any topics on which you have a conflict of interest. Acroterion (talk) 11:37, 31 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
I am quite certain if you read my posts, I am defending my position and responding to inappropriate claims. Certainly this is different from soap-boxing.
As you will see from my comments, I accepted naming a company was an error and this should have been the end of the matter. It actually turned out to be the start of it! Qualitative CBD Researcher (talk) 11:41, 31 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Your aggressive tone after abusing Wikipedia's voice to endorse a particular product line isn't going to gain you much credit. You appear to be trying to advertise on Wikipedia, and bluster after being caught doing so is not an appropriate response. Acroterion (talk) 11:44, 31 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Please highlight the aggressive content to me.... this is an over exaggerated statement. Qualitative CBD Researcher (talk) 11:47, 31 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Pretty much everything you've posted at the COI noticeboard. Please reconsider your approach to interactions with other editors. Acroterion (talk) 11:51, 31 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
My interactions are solid arguments presented in a logical and polite manner. I am not swearing or threatening other editors, merely pointing out I disagree with their viewpoints. Qualitative CBD Researcher (talk) 11:56, 31 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
I encourage you to check the latest thread on this matter. Maybe you will see by the abusive language by Bon Courage that the caution of aggressive behaviour should be directed at him. Thank you. Qualitative CBD Researcher (talk) 12:49, 31 October 2022 (UTC)Reply