Welcome! edit

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! 220 of Borg 06:22, 24 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Q123T, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit

 

Hi Q123T! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Jtmorgan (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

February 2017 edit

  This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please stop spamming articles with links to The Quint, it appears that it's the only thing you're doing here.SpacemanSpiff 14:49, 23 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

This chap's name is QUINT except he has replaced the UIN with 123. Perhaps he should change his user name to something that doesn't resembel the Quint or stop denying that he is connected to the QUINT. That's my advice. I am on a random ISP generator just saying is all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.92.25.9 (talk) 13:03, 1 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm 220 of Borg. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the main body of 2016 JNU protests. Generally, any relevant external links should be listed in an "External links" section at the end of the article and meet the external links guidelines. Links within the body of an article should be internal Wikilinks. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 220 of Borg 06:23, 24 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at 2016 JNU protests. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. 220 of Borg 06:29, 24 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  —SpacemanSpiff 06:54, 24 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Copyvios edit

Ping SpacemanSpiff. Example: Addition and source. I think there are more. I'll get started on them. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 07:41, 24 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Q123T (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I was not aware of some of the policies. Besides, my intention was not to spam the wikipedia pages. I am a first time user and this might have have happened unintentioanlly. Will be more careful in the future. Look forward to contributing to wikipedia.

Decline reason:

This wasn't accidental. This was very obviously your only goal. Yamla (talk) 12:01, 24 February 2017 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You were sufficiently warned, but it's obvious you didn't care about it until blocked and you couldn't spam your copyvios anymore. —SpacemanSpiff 09:30, 24 February 2017 (UTC)Reply