Copyright problems with Shukria (band) edit

 

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Shukria (band), please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://brookvalerecords.com/br1/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=42&Itemid=38. As a copyright violation, Shukria (band) appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Shukria (band) has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Shukria (band) and send an email with the message to permissions-en wikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Shukria (band) with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en wikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Shukria (band).

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. 99.11.4.238 (talk) 03:59, 20 February 2010 (UTC)Reply


You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

 

The article Shukria (band) has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 04:05, 20 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Shukria (band), to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Please read WP:BAND. NawlinWiki (talk) 04:21, 20 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

  This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Shukria (band), you will be blocked from editing. NawlinWiki (talk) 04:25, 20 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

I have no problems removing the reference to shukria on brookvale records link if this inot permissive due to copyright laws. this band is relevant and the bio was taken from their page on brookvale records. everything will be redone according to proper standards. they mean something right now especially in the tri state area and people do want to know their history in which i will research better and put up the right way this time without referencing brookvale's page. thank you

Request handled by: Punkrockdoggie (talk)

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

February 2010 edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for spamming or advertising. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Blueboy96 04:58, 20 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Punkrockdoggie (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

i'm requesting this unblock due to the nature of who why and what this band is about, the members of shukria are currently in and are from other popular bands that are a part of and will always be a part of rock and roll history such as taking back sunday and the movielife both important bands in american rock culture. they do not need advertising on wiki for kids to want to know who they are and have released material through record labels in the past. yet they are a new underground band with indie level attention they have been mentioned in big magazines, played on major and college radio, and written about on various websites that are big in the music world. i may have not put it together properly but i can reassure you that mistake won't be made again if given that chance. i'm sorry as i'm completely new to wikipedia. and as far as the link to their bio on brookvale records website goes, that will not be a problem to not have included on their page and was removed immediately as soon as i saw that msg. this page as well as my user was def unjustly blocked. it was the first page i ever put up and i plan on adding my vast and accurate knowledge of music indie and major to the world cause that's what i know about. i'm sorry if i'm a music fan but that's what i care about reading writing and informing people about the most. i don't critique or judge people who only want to spread the good word on flowers, they should, as i should about music. shukria deserves a wikipedia page just as much as half these bands you have up that have done less than shukria has accomplishment wise and it isn't fair if it's a double standard. i can understand them being moved under shukria (band) but then blocked after that??? come on. just having the drummer from taking back sunday in the band alone should prove they don't need this for advertising. this band is relevant and the bio was taken from their page on brookvale records. everything will be redone according to proper standards. they mean something right now especially in the tri state area and people do want to know their history in which i will research better and put up the right way this time without referencing brookvale's page. i'd expect you'd understand what i'm saying here and hope you'd choose to do the right thing. thank you in advance

Decline reason:

Notability is not in the mind's eye. You were advised more than once to not recreate the material. The article was poorly referenced, and does not meet the requirements to be on Wikipedia. The subsequent creation of another account to recreate the identical information is reason enough to maintain this block. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:00, 23 February 2010 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Punkrockdoggie (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

You're right, notability is not in the minds eye. if someone releases something thru major distribution they deserve it regardless of what you think. you have countless bands with not one professional release listed and this is exactly why everyone i know including major articles continue to state wikipedia is both biased and lame. best of luck with your personal grudges. not to mention that the recreated page was done correctly and you are absolutely wrong this time around. first time yes you were right. this time DEAD WRONG

Decline reason:

This is not an unblock request, rather a retort. If you wish to be unblocked please give reasoning, specifically details on why you should be unblocked, and how you will follow policy. The article may be able to be salvaged, but without a reasonable response from you we cannot assume you'll edit appropriately. NJA (t/c) 08:11, 24 February 2010 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Punkrockdoggie (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

if you still have and/or can look at the shukria (music) page everything was done within guidelines. i removed the biography in their history section that i took from brookvale records website and replaced it with the barebone basics of when the band was formed, what they released, and at what point the final member joined the band. i also removed all the references that were up as well. everything was stripped down to the bare basic facts. i do believe at that point it properly met your guidelines, however i still agree it should be under shukria (band) not shukria (music)

Decline reason:

Since this request doesn't indicate that you understand the notability criteria yet, and since you're promising, if unblocked, to recreate the article even though it isn't clear how it meets those criteria, it would be wrong for me to undo this entirely appropriate block. Please be aware that you do need to understand and follow WP:MUSIC and WP:RS with all new articles, and if you don't understand those rules, you won't be able to follow them. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 18:28, 24 February 2010 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Punkrockdoggie (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

yes i do now understand and yes the artist does meet your criteria

Decline reason:

You have made it abundantly clear that you intend to continue this crusade no matter what. We don't do crusades here. In the interest of not wasting any more time with your frivolous unblock requests, I am revoking your ability to edit this talk page. Email WP:BASC if you wish to appeal further. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:53, 24 February 2010 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.