Pulpfictionstories

Hello, Pulpfictionstories! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! SwisterTwister talk 06:04, 21 June 2012 (UTC) Getting Started The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

AfD Spy Killer

The article that you created, Spy Killer, has been nominated for deletion. Please post all comments on the AfD discussion page. Thank you. Spidey104 20:15, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Branded Outlaw

The relavent details of the 'branded outlaw' book you want to use as a reference is already present in the article, there is no need to add additional links to the same book. The {{reflimprove}} tag means the article needs additional independent references and it should not be removed until these are added. Try using the following links to search for sources.
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Thanks Sarahj2107 (talk) 21:20, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

May 2012

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Sarahj2107 (talk) 21:43, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Branded outlaw

Hi, the link you added, to Google books is referencing the same book as is already cited in the reference section of the article (Hubbard, L. Ron (2008). Branded Outlaw. ISBN 978-1592122585.)It doesn't need to link to an actual web page because the ISBN is provided and clicking on it will take you to a page that provides multiple online sources for the book. What the article now needs is 3rd party references, like reviews or mentions in newspapers. An independent source that supports that it was first published in the October 1938 issue of "Five Novels Monthly" magazine would be helpful for example. I know these are sometimes hard to find so if you leave the {{reflimprove}} tag on, other editors will see it, it will be added to a maintenance category and they can help find references. I hope this helps, if your still not sure let me know. Sarahj2107 (talk) 22:47, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of If I Were You (book)

The article If I Were You (book) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability at all.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Guillaume2303 (talk) 04:31, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Great Secret

The article The Great Secret has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:BOOKCRIT. No reviews in any mainstream sources. One brief review on a blog of the audiobook edition.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cambial — foliar❧ 11:24, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Iron Duke (novel)

The article The Iron Duke (novel) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability; does not meet WP:BOOKCRIT. Three sentence review in Publishers Weekly. Two sentence review of the book on an audiobook website.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cambial — foliar❧ 11:45, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dead Men Kill

The article Dead Men Kill has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability; does not meet WP:BOOKCRIT. Six sentence review in Publishers Weekly. Two sentence review of the book on an audiobook website.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cambial — foliar❧ 11:51, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Branded Outlaw

The article Branded Outlaw has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability; does not meet WP:BOOKCRIT. Not even Publishers Weekly bother to review it when rereleased as an audiobook.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cambial — foliar❧ 11:54, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Under the Black Ensign

The article Under the Black Ensign has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability; does not meet WP:BOOKCRIT. Five sentence review in Publishers Weekly. One or two sentences on the book on an audiobook website. One sentence passing reference in a listicle on books by Hubbard in The Hindustan Times.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

• If I Were You (Hubbard novel)

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 26 August 2023 (UTC)