User talk:Pulpfiction621/Archive 1

Discussion at Incidents noticeboard

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. לילך5 (talk) 04:05, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Responded to the notice. Thank you for alerting me! Pulpfiction621 (talk) 13:30, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Oversimplified

(He was known for not being the smartest toll in the shead) was real you sould let wikipedians to some happynes don t reverte my edite s. OversimpIified (talk) 18:27, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Please stop vandalizing Wikipedia pages, it's a lot of work for people to constantly undo. Thank you! Pulpfiction621 (talk) 18:40, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

|}

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia! I especially appreciate your reverting of unconstructive edits. LPS and MLP Fan (Littlest Pet Shop and My Little Pony Fan) 16:58, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For your efforts in counter-vandalism...Keep it up! Volten001 ☎ 14:30, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

A brownie for you!

For your continued work removing vandalism from Wikipedia! Hope you enjoy this! LPS and MLP Fan (Littlest Pet Shop and My Little Pony Fan) 16:52, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Delicious! Thank you! Pulpfiction621 (talk) 16:54, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

		The Barnstar of Integrity
		Well done! That's what we're all about :) Wikipelli Talk 22:26, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

September 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  GeneralNotability (talk) 01:20, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pulpfiction621 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I noticed my account was randomly banned for “sockpuppetry” with “Th78Blue”. I looked at my edit history to see where this user and I have interacted recently and it’s only been to unrevert some edits of mine that had been previously reverted. Otherwise, I haven’t interacted with him/her/them that much at all. This is just so surprising given how much hard work and effort I have put into the Encyclopedia (nearly 10,000 edits) all for it to be undone because somebody believes that me and some other person are working in cahoots, despite the fact that all I’ve been able to find suggests he/she/them basically agreed with SOME of my edits a few times in the past and vice versa. :When I revert vandalism from random people whose only goal is to write “pee pee or poo poo” jokes on serious pages, I still give them due process of four warnings before reporting them to the admin. Yet, despite my hard work and countless hours of free labor contributing to Wikipedia, I am greeted today with an indefinite ban because another user liked my edits. I am incredibly disappointed, and expected more from a community that I respect so highly. :That being said, I would still like my account to be reinstated given the countless hours I have put into it and the fact that I still deeply believe in Wikipedia’s mission. When I’m reinstated, I will prominently place a warning on my userpage cautioning other users from interacting with me, unless they wish to risk claims of “sockpuppetry” or “meat puppetry”, or some other term that I end up learning as I continue to work on Wikipedia. My only goal now is to focus on my work improving the encyclopedia and I don’t want random users preventing me from doing that. Thank you. Pulpfiction621 (talk) 23:33, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

My findings concur with those of User:GeneralNotability, I'm afraid. Drmies (talk) 02:35, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ongoing TP discussion

Hello @Pulpfiction621

Please see ongoing TP discussion that is related to you and your pending unblock request at User talk:Th78blue. Riverbend21 (talk) 10:11, 31 October 2022 (UTC)