Puipuianunuibuangpuia1

Welcome!

Hello, Puipuianunuibuangpuia1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Introduction tutorial
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or . Again, welcome.  Doug Weller talk 14:56, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Doug first of all appreciate your works and thanks but i wanna inform i myself am from a mizo kuki chin people i dont care what online sources says .i know my history i know my roots this kuki is not what we are .u know whites are called angreji in hindi .now what if online sources agrees and use this instead of the word brits or whites Surely surely surly someone will surely get offended .now in this case i got offended so i changed it when i saw it . No one had even wikipedia has the right to change someones history my history wanna know bout mizo people ask themselves thats the best or use some sources approved by themselves i m a mizo not kuki not KUKI or else dont spread misinformation without the awareness of m Puipuianunuibuangpuia1 (talk) 17:56, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

The mizo people if you wanna know then ask me . anyway thanks for everything hope u see this and understand facts (one thing the identity northeastern parts of india is a very sensitive issue so be careful) God bless ya Puipuianunuibuangpuia1 (talk) 18:00, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Besides being unsourced, your edits are making a mess

Do you really think it is sensible to actually change the titles of our sources? And some of your edits are breaking links to existing articles. Doug Weller talk 15:07, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Hmmmm u guys think u know all stuffs and anyway who even gave u people the right to post an article of k Puipuianunuibuangpuia1 (talk) 17:04, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Kuki mizo people .ok let me explain it to u kind of people in this way suppose u r a brit and theres no article for u people in wikipedia and i was among much civil Puipuianunuibuangpuia1 (talk) 17:08, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Civilised modern society and aware of wiki ok just suppose ok to make u clear and u brits werent that modern and mainstream on internet(social media also)and i ya i somehow get to knew bout u guys and i thought i should make an article but as i said being not mainstr.. i couldnt find any detail research done bout u brit by your own people . So someway i found rare researh done by completely another person (like u guys used david peterson) who didnt ask the local brits and just relied on books and record of someone and showed it to the world where there were many flaws but he didnt know it cause u know no one told him . Then i saw that and posted it on wiki wiki .and some year later u the brit i mention bought phone and thought to search for your people on wiki .but guess what u guys were m Puipuianunuibuangpuia1 (talk) 17:20, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Mentioned as bugs which was used by the superior race neighbouring in olden time Puipuianunuibuangpuia1 (talk) 17:22, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Neighb... u r people in olden time as a mocking name and as they were superior as time passed they got modernized much earlier than u brit so many author rose among them and some even wrote bout u but as how their ancester called u not knowing how ur culture tradition language and ur race name is! And ya that completely another person(means not a brit)from whos research i got something to post got his stuff from this authors book . Ok now read carefully he dont know what wrong in that book cause their not much books to rely cause u brit got modernize late and so u guys had historical records less (the case with mizo kuki people)and he use it . Now u saw it u saw the bug word u got offended and wanna change it and u change it . Later i saw the changes and i thought who the hell is this dude is who dare to change my sources (why i said like this? cause as i told u i didnt know it is wrong cause i thought i got it from a person had done research even used it for academic term) and i change d it again . Now u saw my reedits and wonder this guy isnt even a brit he dont even know my peoples detailed history which our granparent had pass down to us .

Thats it

Okayyy now tell whos wrong dont know read again carefully and use ur source using brain

In the the story above you are me and i was as you ok. I used the term brit to refers to mizo zo people and Puipuianunuibuangpuia1 (talk) 17:41, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

The superior race as bengali burmese and the british whites . The mockery word bug refers to kuki and chin .the completely another person who did research refers to d.peterson and e Puipuianunuibuangpuia1 (talk) 17:44, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

And etc etc mr doug dont u understand me we want recognition but of our true self .can u tell me how did u got the right to even post bout mizo people u who is sitting at home from a completely different country is telling me he know more stuff about mizo zo kuki well u r reading a reply of a very mizo person

My message may be harsh sorry for that but i hope one day u will understand .

GOD BLESS U MAN👋 Puipuianunuibuangpuia1 (talk) 18:08, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

We all must follow. WP:VERIFY and WP:NOR. ………… — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doug Weller (talk • contribs) 19:08, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

So what if i publish the facts i have mentioned on a website can i use it or at least can i put or (eg-Kuki-chin languages or kuki-chin-mizo languages) Puipuianunuibuangpuia1 (talk) 07:34, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Please have a look at the links provided by PaleoNeonate below. Self-published material are non considered reliable sources, as you can read here: WP:SPS. If your claims are indeed generally accepted "facts", you should be able to find external reliable sources that back up these claims. –Austronesier (talk) 09:30, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Zou language, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mizo. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:44, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

How can u say its unrelated i am a mizo i know more stuff but thanks anyway for telling and ya its related wanna know how leave reply

Puipuianunuibuangpuia1 (talk) 18:11, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

July 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Kuki-Chin languages, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Austronesier (talk) 08:51, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

Do not manipulate the titles of sources, as you have repeatedly have done here[1][2] and here[3][4]. You have to bring up reliable sources that back up your edits; manipulating sources is certainly not the right way, and may result in a block. @Doug Weller: They keep on doing it. –Austronesier (talk) 19:10, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

I keep doing for a fact that u dont know yet Puipuianunuibuangpuia1 (talk) 13:16, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vaiphei language, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mizo.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:48, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

About Wikipedia

Hello Puipuianunuibuangpuia1. I have read what you posted on this talk page and think that you misunderstand how Wikipedia works. Some editors have explained already but it's possible that it was not detailed enough.

• Wikipedia as an encyclopedia appeals to the authority of sources written by independent scholars, etc. Reliable source has more information and the Reliable Sources Noticeboard or this directory can be used to assess the reliability of a source. Such sources are needed to support any material of the encyclopedia and they must be cited. The text of articles cannot be changed to not correspond to the existing sources without also replacing those sources that the new text must be a summary of.
• Personal experience, opinions and editor's own research or synthesis is not allowed in articles. This means that we can only report what the sources say.
• All this does mean that a type of systemic bias cannot be avoided. Editors cannot correct this, if scholars or reliable sources are wrong and we cannot find other reliable sources that correct or contradict them, only work done outside the encyclopedia to improve the situation and knowledge in those areas can help. There are other venues for that like having papers published in the relevant journals, etc.
• The existence of an article, like one on a people, depends on if notability is met (that enough independent reliable sources cover the topic such that enough material can be written). Not on if the article has errors, unless of course it was a blatant hoax or an attack page.

I hope this explains the situation. Please click on the blue links of this message for more details. —PaleoNeonate – 22:44, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Tutorials and help

Maybe these could be also useful to you:

• Help:Introduction (this also links to WP:ADVENTURE among other resources)
• The Teahouse, a place where experienced editors offer volunteer help
• The help desk
• I see you already created your sandbox page here, this can be used for editing tests

—PaleoNeonate – 02:47, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

Thanks Puipuianunuibuangpuia1 (talk) 08:14, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

I didnt get one thing. U mean if i edited an article in my sandbox , it will be considered just a test is it . Im nervous if i mess up again others may feel me annoying and disturbed . Puipuianunuibuangpuia1 (talk) 08:24, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

Don't worry, your sandbox is not an article, so you can really do tests edits there, or make text drafts for later edits in "real" articles. –Austronesier (talk) 09:07, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

So there are options

is it? Puipuianunuibuangpuia1 (talk) 09:11, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

Hey that india article i told u to see did u see mizo being mentioned .Can u tell me why isnt it on the india people article Puipuianunuibuangpuia1 (talk) 09:13, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

Yes you can even copy-paste an article into your sandbox and start editing it there (make sure to copy from the source rather than from the web page rendering for best results). The history allows to then obtain differences between the original and your new edits. If the sandbox is long unused (WP:G13) or becomes effectively a fork (WP:POVFORK) it could eventually be nominated for deletion, though. —PaleoNeonate – 05:04, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

August 2020

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Mizoram, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. David Biddulph (talk) 12:35, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Sorry for it Puipuianunuibuangpuia1 (talk) 12:55, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Indian people. Austronesier (talk) 12:55, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

U mean every word need source Puipuianunuibuangpuia1 (talk) 14:02, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Search india and look at its eight scheduled languages , there is mizo But theres no m Puipuianunuibuangpuia1 (talk) 14:06, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Mizo word on the indian people article so it contradicts each other or they forgot it to put. Puipuianunuibuangpuia1 (talk) 14:08, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

So i just add it there . if giving me wa Puipuianunuibuangpuia1 (talk) 14:09, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

If you re giving me warning why not give warning also to the guy who put mizo on the india article i thought i was doing good by putting something missing which was on other article See it for yourself u say anyone can edit wikipedia and ya sticking also with rules

I was thinking to look for indian related articles which had some wrongs and correct .so i saw the mizo being mentioned on india article but when i look at indian people it wasnt . I thought y isnt it there while its on the india one edited by someone which is approved .so i thought that they may have made some mistakes and corrected it

Really wanna see whats your answers to this Puipuianunuibuangpuia1 (talk) 14:23, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Mizo-Kuki-Chin

You may be happy to hear that I have found some good sources (in scholarly books and journals from experts in linguistics) that refer to the language group as "Mizo-Kuki-Chin languages". I will check if this is sufficient for changing the page names per WP:COMMONNAME, because we have to show that "Mizo-Kuki-Chin languages" is more common than just "Kuki-Chin languages", especially in new sources. But even if we cannot move the page titles, we can still mention "Mizo-Kuki-Chin" based on good sources. I will do some changes in the next days. –Austronesier (talk) 13:52, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

Sir thanks alot for going through all the stuffs. Really appreciate it . When u will have time sir can u tell me how to find sources for our claims , is it just to web it or something else? Sir one thing just pop up in my mind , if the kuki chin is going to be changed what about it's related pages (northern kuki c.. southern kuki ch..m proto kuki ch... central kuki ch... etc) just mentioned it THANK YOU Puipuianunuibuangpuia1 (talk) 05:44, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Yes, you can do a web search for the search terms "Mizo-Kuki-Chin languages" vs. "Kuki-Chin languages". But remember, since this is mostly a matter of language classification, you should stick to academic sources, so ideally you can look for it in Google Scholar. There is a publication series that has a lot of papers dealing with the study of the languages in your area, it's called North East Indian Linguistics, and some volumes are available here[5].

Actually, you will see that many scholars still use the traditional term "Kuki-Chin" even in the most recent sources. One eminent scholar, Scott DeLancey, has used "Mizo-Kuki-Chin languages" in some articles from around 2010, but now has switched back to "Kuki-Chin languages". Linguists are usually sensitive to issues like the ones you have brought up (like "Kuki" sounding negative for your community); many experts are active in language community projects and also enganged in Bible translations (like SIL International), and they wouldn't use expressions that are insulting to the community. –Austronesier (talk) 13:22, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

I have just found out another thing: in the page Kuki-Chin languages, one of the sources is a dissertation:

VanBik, Kenneth (2009). Proto-Kuki-Chin: A Reconstructed Ancestor of the Kuki-Chin Languages.

I have tried to find info about the author, and you will maybe be suprised to see this:[6]. Prof. Van Bik is a Hakha, and his father translated the Hakha Bible.[7] So it's not only the colonial "Brits" who use "Kuki-Chin", but also people how belong to the group of ethnicities that speak Kuki-Chin languages. –Austronesier (talk) 14:52, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)