Puhleec
Welcome! edit
Hello, Puhleec, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --Pokechu22 (talk) 23:15, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
Wrong reference edit
hi Puhleec how are you, then the quote is written that said that menelik "The territories north of the Merab Melash (modern Eritrea) do not belong to nor are under my rule. I am the Emperor of Abyssinia. The lands Referred to as Eritrea is not peopled by Abyssinians, they are Adals, Bejas, and Tigres. Abyssinia will defend her territories but it will not fight for foreign lands of Eritrea Which is to my knowledge. "
the reference must be verifiable and authoritative the reference in question is Geschichte Afrikas Vol. 6 (1905), p.455-500 Institut für Weltgeschichte Presse which does not mention at all what is on wikipedia is a wrong--Mulugheta alula roma (talk) 08:02, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
June 2016 edit
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Clubjustin Talkosphere 07:36, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
User:Clubjustin, Actually here is a record of the Edits reverting which you began by Reverting the Additions I made as well as corrections with explanations. If anything, you violated the three-revert rule by Reverting my Edits without Any discussions on the Talkpage of the Tigrayan article. I reverted your edit-war like reverts of my Contributory edits of the Tigrayan Article. I have left a message on your Talkpage explaining to you that a discussion is happening between me and SennaitGebremariam. I even welcomed you to join the Conversation, I have been asking for a Neutral Party to the Discussion. I have stated in the Talkpage Wiki Admins/Editors needed to discuss the issue me and SennaitGebremariam are having on this Article.
Now please do bring or inform a Neutral Party to the discussion for which I would like to have to bring to consensus the Points of Contention between me and SennaitGebremariam. Will you be able to support this?Puhleec (talk) 03:23, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
(cur | prev) 07:11, 23 June 2016 Puhleec (talk | contribs) . . (41,723 bytes) (+3,946) . . (Undid revision 726610801 by Clubjustin (talk) No I am Removing EthiopianHabesha's POV of CALLING something Secondary Source, if So then We Can Call everything on Wikipedia Secondary source.) (undo)
(cur | prev) 07:09, 23 June 2016 Clubjustin (talk | contribs) . . (37,777 bytes) (-3,946) . . (Reverted 1 edit by Puhleec (talk): That is your POV. Please see WP:NPOV. (TW)) (undo | thank)
(cur | prev) 07:06, 23 June 2016 Puhleec (talk | contribs) . . (41,723 bytes) (+3,946) . . (Undid revision 726610431 by Clubjustin (talk) What FACTS? Those Additions were based on attempt to Discredit Sources.) (undo)
(cur | prev) 07:05, 23 June 2016 Clubjustin (talk | contribs) . . (37,777 bytes) (-3,946) . . (Reverted 1 edit by Puhleec (talk): You are removing clear facts. also, my rollback tool doesn't allow edit summarys , nor are they always required. (TW)) (undo | thank)
(cur | prev) 07:03, 23 June 2016 Puhleec (talk | contribs) . . (41,723 bytes) (+3,946) . . (Undid revision 726610070 by Clubjustin (talk)Clubjustin Gave No Reasons why He Reverted, Reverting his Reversion.) (undo)
(cur | prev) 07:01, 23 June 2016 Clubjustin (talk | contribs) m . . (37,777 bytes) (-3,946) . . (Reverted edits by Puhleec (talk) to last version by Abrahamic Faiths) (undo | thank) Puhleec (talk) 03:23, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
Block appeal edit
Puhleec (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Request to unblock me for the reasons stated below about my accusers EthiopianHabesha/HistoryofEthiopia and Wizeone2/Resourcer1 All four of these accounets are sockpuppeeters/sockpuppets. See more details provided below this Appeal Block as I could not fit into this reason for unblock appeal:Puhleec (talk) 06:28, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 06:51, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.