Psycho Samurai
This is in response to this message, as I don't wish to have a conversation with you on another editor's talk page. I'm not sure what you think Wikipedia is for, but it is definitely not a place to disrupt for the purpose of pushing an agenda. If you think a particular editor is biased or is editing with an unacceptable conflict of interest, please take it to the article talk page or utilize one of our dispute resolution processes. Replacing articles with declarations against particular editors and inserting your own rants into articles is unacceptable and will remain unacceptable whatever your reasons are. I am making absolutely no comment on your right-ness or lack thereof; I'm only commenting on the inappropriateness of your tactics. If this is the way you work you'll need to take it somewhere else. Natalie 00:20, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Aysakian flag.jpg edit
Thank you for uploading Image:Aysakian flag.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 00:41, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
It was created by me - and I have put my OWN brand of licensing upon it.
Psycho Samurai 00:54, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- You're more than welcome to keep the statement on the image page, but you still need to put a license tag on it or it will be deleted. As you have created it, you may consider licensing it through the GFDL or the Creative Commons license. Natalie 01:14, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Yet I do not want just anyone using it. Pluss...... it won't let me back in :))
Psycho Samurai 02:15, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what you mean by "it won't let me back in", so I can't help you with that. But you can't upload images to Wikipedia unless they are freely licensed, public domain, or fit the very narrow non-free content criteria (which your image does not, by the way). So you're kind of in between a rock and a hard place - if you want to use the image on your userpage, it needs to be freely licensed. If you don't want "just anyone" using it, uploading to Wikipedia is probably not a good idea. Natalie 02:20, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
If you are able - delete it. I cannot access it to either delete or modify.
Psycho Samurai 02:25, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Thank you.
Psycho Samurai 02:31, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Wal-Mart links edit
The first link you added to the yahoo groups site goes against Wikipedia's external link guidelines. First, it contains a password, making it pretty much useless to most users. People generally don't want to have to login to a site just to access content. But also, forums and discussion group sites are also generally discouraged, as they are either (a) POV or (b) promoting a particular website or ideology, which is not the purpose of wikipedia.
The second link just isn't relevant to the page relating to Criticism of Wal-Mart. It would be more relevant to the main Wal-Mart article, because it contains information about the corporation itself. But even then, it would be redundant, because the link just links to an internal page on Wal-Mart's corporpate site, which is already linked to from the Wal-Mart article. So it's really not necessary. Plus, information on Wal-Mart's various corporate divisions is already covered in pretty good detail in that article as well. Dr. Cash 17:32, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
August 2007 edit
Please do not attack other editors, which you did here: User talk:Gscshoyru. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Gscshoyru 21:02, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
You have a choice, Gscshoyru - either quit pushing biased POVs or ***ing run.
Psycho Samurai 21:06, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- So you're the sockpuppeteer of all those ip's... gotcha. The labels on the links have been changed to one's that might better suit you, if you cared to look. And I agree with the change as well. I'm not saying their site isn't biased, it probably is, and I hate wal-mart besides. But linking to their own page from an article about them is encouraged. So please stop your personal attacks and POV pushing before you get banned. Thanks! Gscshoyru 21:09, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
This is your last warning.
If you continue to make personal attacks on other people as you did at User talk:Gscshoyru, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Gscshoyru 21:14, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
I do not officially regignize you as an authority upon this site - as your edits of numerous articles have shown you to be clueless at best and heavily biased at worst. If you wish respect and to be taken seriously, you must change your outlook.
Psycho Samurai 21:24, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- I am an authority on this site, as are the other 1200+ admins. Any further personal attack or other disruptive edit WILL lead to your immediate block from editing privileges. --Anthony.bradbury"talk" 21:28, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Blocked for 1 Week Due to Incivility edit
You have been blocked for 1 week because you have chosen not to heed the WP:CIVIL policy. Personal attacks like this and the others you have posted are unacceptable. Please take this time to cool off and come back without continuing this behavior.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 21:28, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Indefinite Block edit
Based on the fact that you have made absolutely no constructive edits to the encyclopedia and have instead been wasting our time with attacking other editors who you get in conflict with and create a massively improper userpage. If you really feel that you should be allowed to edit here, request that you be unblocked with {{unblock|Your reason here}}—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 02:32, 14 August 2007 (UTC)