User talk:Prisencolin/Archive 7

Archive 1

←

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

Archive 8

Archive 9

Archive 10

Unsourced content

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Benjaman Kyle. Thank you. Jytdog (talk) 16:12, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Edit warring

Your recent editing history at Benjaman Kyle shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jytdog (talk) 16:12, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lists of white people

The article Lists of white people has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This would be more appropriate as a section here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_lists_of_lists#People than as its own page.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JamesG5 (talk) 05:53, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Category:White people has been nominated for discussion

Category:White people, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. EvergreenFir (talk) 06:06, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Barack Obama

Obama was the first African American to serve as US president (and is not merely "considered" as such), and there is no need to qualify it in the lead by pointing out that his upbringing was "unlike most African Americans". The statement without the qualification is factual; the statement is not about his upbringing. Your introduction of this comment to the lead is not neutral. General Ization ^Talk 15:24, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

The statement does not say anything about "victory" for African Americans. It is a statement of fact, and does not require that your evident bias be reflected (in fact, requires that it not be). General Ization ^Talk 15:28, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

@General Ization: I'd say the bare assertion that Obama is the first African-American president without additional detail is not neutral. I'll discuss further in the talk page.--Prisencolin (talk) 06:47, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of South American Americans

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on South American Americans requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 00:12, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of North American Americans

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on North American Americans requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 00:46, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Central American Americans

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Central American Americans requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 00:46, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of North American Americans

A tag has been placed on North American Americans requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

(A11: Article about a subject obviously invented by article creator or associate, which does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sir Joseph ^(talk) 13:49, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lists of white people

A tag has been placed on Lists of white people requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

(A11: Article about a subject obviously invented by article creator or associate, which does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sir Joseph ^(talk) 13:50, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of White Americans in San Francisco for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article White Americans in San Francisco is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White Americans in San Francisco until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sir Joseph ^(talk) 17:38, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of African Americans in San Francisco

A tag has been placed on African Americans in San Francisco requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

no indication that this group is notable in any way

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. WWGB (talk) 05:15, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ye Fei, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Minnan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Every Good Game.png

Thank you for uploading File:Every Good Game.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:33, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

WikiCup 2017 November newsletter: Final results

The final round of the 2017 WikiCup is over. Congratulations to the 2017 WikiCup top three finalists:

• First Place - Adityavagarwal (submissions)
• Second Place - Vanamonde (submissions)
• Third Place - Cas Liber (submissions)

In addition to recognizing the achievements of the top finishers and everyone who worked hard to make it to the final round, we also want to recognize those participants who were most productive in each of the WikiCup scoring categories:

• Featured Article – Cas Liber (actually a two-way tie with themselves for an astonishing five FAs in R2 and R4).
• Good Article – Adityavagarwal had 14 GAs promoted in R5.
• Featured List – Bloom6132 (submissions) and 1989 (submissions) both produced 2 FLs in R2
• Featured Pictures – SounderBruce (submissions) improved an image to FP status in R5, the only FP this year.
• Featured Topic – MPJ-DK (submissions) has the only FT of the Cup in R3.
• Good Topic – Four different editors created a GT in R2, R3 and R4.
• Did You Know – Adityavagarwal had 22 DYKs on the main page in R5.
• In The News – MBlaze Lightning (submissions) had 14 ITN on the main page in R2.
• Good Article Review – Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (submissions) completed 31 GARs in R1.

Over the course of the 2017 WikiCup the following content was added or improved on Wikipedia: 51 Featured Articles, 292 Good Articles, 18 Featured Lists, 1 Featured Picture, 1 Featured Topics, 4 Good Topics, around 400 Did You Knows, 75 In The News, and 442 Good Article Reviews. Thank you to all the competitors for your hard work and what you have done to improve Wikipedia.

Regarding the prize vouchers - @Adityavagarwal, Vanamonde93, Casliber, Bloom6132, 1989, and SounderBruce: please send Godot13 (talk · contribs · email) an email from the email address to which you would like your Amazon voucher sent. Please include your preference of global Amazon marketplace as well. We hope to have the electronic gift cards processed and sent within a week.

We will open up a discussion for comments on process and scoring in a few days. The 2018 WikiCup is just around the corner! Many thanks from all the judges. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email), and Godot13 (talk · contribs · email) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:41, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of 2017 League of Legends World Championship for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2017 League of Legends World Championship is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2017 League of Legends World Championship until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ibicdlcod (talk) 11:14, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Creepiness by Adam Kotsko

Hi there, just wanted to check to see if you still need the first chapter of this book, per your request on the Resource Exchange. Thanks, --Usernameunique (talk) 20:54, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

WikiCup 2018

So the 2017 WikiCup has come to an end. Congratulations to the winner, to the other finalists and to all those who took part. 177 contestants signed up, more than usual, but not all of them submitted entries in the first round. Were editors attracted by the cash prizes offered for the first time this year, or were these irrelevant? Do the rules and scoring need changing for the 2018 WikiCup? If you have a view on these or other matters, why not join in the WikiCup discussion about next year's contest? Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Godot13 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

MLG parodies listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect MLG parodies. Since you had some involvement with the MLG parodies redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Thankful for cooperation, thankful for Wikipedia, Gaioa (click to talk) 11:04, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Prisencolin. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jani-King

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jani-King, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. South Nashua (talk) 16:43, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jani-King

The article Jani-King has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Contested Speedy. COI, SPAM, Also appeared to fail CORPDEPTH

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. South Nashua (talk) 16:56, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Is this the right place to ask for wikitext help?

I saw your question at Wikipedia talk:Village pump (technical)#Is this the right place to ask for wikitext help?... did you get an answer?

And if not, what's the question? I'm happy to have a go... I've been here a while so I may know the answer, and if not always glad to learn, so I'll try to find out for you.

I'll watch this page, but if you answer here (or anywhere other than my talk page in fact) putting {{u|Andrewa}} anywhere in a talk page post will ping me and I'll know to look. TIA Andrewa (talk) 05:11, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Hi, I hardly remember making this post, but I imagine that I did. Thanks for asking and happy holidays!—Prisencolin (talk) 06:03, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

esports

hey prisencolin, I was sent to you via user:Ferret. This is Rod Breslau/Slasher from world of esports and competitive gaming, and Ferret thought you may be the best person to talk to regarding esports stuff on wiki. I wanted to inquire about the possibility about creating/editing more personal pages for notable industry leaders such as myself and others such as djWHEAT, 2GD, Thorin, Richard Lewis, etc, that I believe fit the requirements of being 'notable' for wikipedia. Additionally, the inclusion of more players personal pages and/or to re-visit the wiki definition of 'esports as a sport' or whether esports players are 'athletes', which I believe was last debated back in 2011 and many things have changed since then (such as the government approving visas designating them as 'athletes'). Lastly, if we could change https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ESports from 'eSports' to 'esports', which most of the leaders within the community agree should be the denomination, and the AP last year agreed with this.

Looking forward to discuss any of this! Thanks!

Slasherr (talk) 17:41, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Han Chinese, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Minnan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:07, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

email

hey man, lets do it. replying back and forth on wiki is confusing so I hope this is right : P

email is thebreslau@gmail.com, hit me up! happy holidays to you too!

Slasherr (talk) 23:29, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Your Weekend with Jim Brickman concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Your Weekend with Jim Brickman, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:LoL Pro League logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LoL Pro League logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Team Kinguin

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Team Kinguin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Gbawden (talk) 06:38, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve List of largest shipyards in history

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Prisencolin, thanks for creating List of largest shipyards in history!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been tagged as needing more sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 19:02, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Sources

Hello, can you please add your sources to Vintoquián? Thansk, Boleyn (talk) 20:09, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Vintoquián

Hello, Prisencolin,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Vintoquián should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vintoquián .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:50, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Item Abuse 3.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Item Abuse 3.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:13, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Category:Millionaires has been nominated for discussion

Category:Millionaires, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Softlavender (talk) 08:44, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Category:American millionaires has been nominated for discussion

Category:American millionaires, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Softlavender (talk) 08:47, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Your Weekend with Jim Brickman

Hello, Prisencolin. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Your Weekend with Jim Brickman".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 14:01, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:League of Legends

Template:League of Legends has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 19:45, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Mid Laner listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mid Laner. Since you had some involvement with the Mid Laner redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 15:01, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Jacob Barnett

Please see the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacob Barnett (4th nomination) and at User talk:Jo-Jo Eumerus#Jacob Barnett before creating any more redirect or disambiguation links. Jonathan A Jones (talk) 18:11, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

WP:IAR no such policy against creating redirects.--Prisencolin (talk) 18:11, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

I strongly suggest that you discuss this matter at User talk:Jo-Jo Eumerus#Jacob Barnett rather than continuing to edit war. Jonathan A Jones (talk) 18:16, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:The Spark book cover.jpg

The file File:The Spark book cover.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not used in any article. The one article it was used in was deleted at AfD.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DanielRigal (talk) 22:02, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Manchu studies for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Manchu studies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manchu studies until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 16:27, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Spark book cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Spark book cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:08, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Manchu studies for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Manchu studies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manchu studies (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- RoySmith (talk) 20:11, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Manchu studies for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Manchu studies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manchu studies (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- RoySmith (talk) 20:12, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Weapons of war listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Weapons of war. Since you had some involvement with the Weapons of war redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Peacock (talk) 13:36, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

WikiCup 2018 March newsletter

And so ends the first round of the competition, with 4 points required to qualify for round 2. With 53 contestants qualifying, the groups for round 2 are slightly smaller than usual, with the two leaders from each group due to qualify for round 3 as well as the top sixteen remaining users.

Our top scorers in round 1 were:

• Aoba47 led the field with a featured article, 8 good articles and 42 GARs, giving a total of 666 points.
• FrB.TG , a WikiCup newcomer, came next with 600 points, gained from a featured article and masses of bonus points.
• Ssven2, another WikiCup newcomer, was in third place with 403 points, garnered from a featured article, a featured list, a good article and twelve GARs.
• Ceranthor, Numerounovedant, Carbrera, Farang Rak Tham and Cartoon network freak all had over 200 points, but like all the other contestants, now have to start again from scratch. A good achievement was the 193 GARs performed by WikiCup contestants, comparing very favourably with the 54 GAs they achieved.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 1 but before the start of round 2 can be claimed in round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews.

If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Cwmhiraeth (talk) and Vanamonde (talk) 15:27, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:NRG eSports logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NRG eSports logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:15, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Lists of white people listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Lists of white people. Since you had some involvement with the Lists of white people redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. feminist (talk) 13:36, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Wu (region)

I attempted to fix the duplicate parameters in the {{infobox Chinese}}, but it still doesn't look quite right. Frietjes (talk) 17:00, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Second Hundred Years' War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page State of war (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Taze

I have again reverted your changes related to Taze.

1. It is highly unlikely that anyone would search for Charles Taze Russell by typing Taze into the search box. It is not standard practice on Wikipedia to have redirects from a person's middle name.
2. Whether there may be alternative Romanisations for a locality in Myanmar has no bearing on this particular redirect.

Irrespective of how significant the town in Myanmar may be, it happens to be the only likely target for the search term Taze.--Jeffro77 (talk) 11:47, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

I'd like to think the move of Charles Taze Russell to Charles T. Russell was not retributive or to make a point. But in any case, it is not at all the most common name. Please note that this has no bearing at all on the suitability of Taze as a redirect to the article. The full name appears more than 4 times as often than the abbreviated form on Google Books.--Jeffro77 (talk) 03:19, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Entertainer

Please note that Wikipedia is not intended to be a dictionary per WP:NOTDIC, a simple definition is not sufficient to make an article. When another article that deals with the topic in depth already existed, then keep it as a redirect. Hzh (talk) 10:57, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

LIRIK (streamer)

Would you be interested in writing an article on Lirik? Real name Saqib Zahid (born October 29, 1990) in Germany currently resides in Boston, Massachusetts currently lives in Watertown, Massachusetts. Valoem ^{talk contrib} 19:49, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

 Done, I went ahead and started an article. Valoem ^{talk contrib} 13:21, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Can you write one on Ninja (streamer), he is the largest streamer right now. Valoem ^{talk contrib} 13:29, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

 Done, I started a stub, I guess all that is left is DrDisRespect. Valoem ^{talk contrib} 14:01, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Ok good job, I’ll see if I can help.—Prisencolin (talk) 14:54, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

 Done stub started. Valoem ^{talk contrib} 15:31, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

March 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Japanese people, without good reason. They need to have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 00:31, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

I just undid your edit

at cultural appropriation with the explanation that " The use of black face emotes is described (in the reference given) as being "racist" not "cultural appropriation." Feel free to argue your case if I missed something or if you feel as if the term still fits. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 00:41, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Same, but at Roldan v. Los Angeles County. Category:Ilocano people is not for court case articles. EvergreenFir (talk) 18:52, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Revoked two of your CSD tags

What are you doing? Leave the account logged in / got hacked or had a few to many beers? — IVORK _Discuss 09:33, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

London Homesick Blues moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, London Homesick Blues, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 07:43, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

WikiCup 2018 May newsletter

The second round of the 2018 WikiCup has now finished. Most contestants who advanced to the next round scored upwards of 100 points, but two with just 10 points managed to scrape through into round 3. Our top scorers in the last round were:

• Cas Liber, our winner in 2016, with three featured articles
• Iazyges, with nine good articles and lots of bonus points
• Yashthepunisher, a first time contestant, with two featured lists
• SounderBruce, a finalist last year, with seventeen good topic articles
• Usernameunique, a first time contestant, with fourteen DYKs
• Muboshgu, a seasoned competitor, with three ITNs and
• Courcelles, another first time contestant, with twenty-seven GARs

So far contestants have achieved twelve featured articles between them and a splendid 124 good articles. Commendably, 326 GARs have been completed during the course of the 2018 WikiCup, so the backlog of articles awaiting GA review has been reduced as a result of contestants' activities. As we enter the third round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met; most of the GARs are fine, but a few have been a bit skimpy.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:10, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Origen

Template:Origen has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 23:00, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:De Anza College logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:De Anza College logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:07, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Foothill College logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Foothill College logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lists of governors

Hello, Prisencolin. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Lists of governors, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Hzh (talk) 13:13, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of largest shipyards in history

The article List of largest shipyards in history has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DARTHBOTTO _talk•cont 10:50, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

You have to fix the pages before you remove the deletion templates. DARTHBOTTO _talk•cont 17:44, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Lists of governors for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lists of governors is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lists of governors until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hzh (talk) 22:16, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Donald Trump on social media, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Coverage (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

ANI notification

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. power~enwiki (π, ν) 04:21, 2 June 2018 (UTC)