User talk:Prioryman/Archive 15

Recommended Reading List for Prioryman:

"Mississippi Solo" by Eddy Harris (1998), The author details his journey from north to south down the Mississippi River, BY CANOE. (Motorcycle not mentioned). Please revert your incorrect edit as soon as is convenient. Thank you.

Your GA nomination of Privy Garden of the Palace of Whitehall

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Privy Garden of the Palace of Whitehall you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Miyagawa -- Miyagawa (talk) 13:41, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Foo Foo (dog) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Foo Foo (dog). Since you had some involvement with the Foo Foo (dog) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 00:25, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

FYI No Fault DS sanctions alert (american politics)

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 14:10, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

added personal note

Thanks for your work on the Occupation article. Starting with myself, I'm trying to make sure everyone who has been making multiple content edits gets the word that the arb AP case applies to most, if not all, of the article. It does not imply any problems with your edits. I'll be happy to talk more about it if you wish. Just leave a note here, I'm watching this location for a few days. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 14:10, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Forts of Montenegro

I just wanted to thank you for the great work you have done, practically single-handedly, on articles related to Montenegrin fortifications. I was surprised by the quality of the articles. Well done. Cheers. Sideshow Bob 08:40, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for your kind comments! There are quite a few more forts around the Boka Kotorska that I didn't get the chance to visit or write about, but I hope to tackle them some time. Prioryman (talk) 12:51, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

"a bag over his head"

I noticed a small typo, "node" vs. "nod", in a quote you added back in 2013 to History of Gibraltar#Gibraltar as a colony. But then I was struck at the 'tone' of the quote and tried to find that source. The version of the source I could find had a markedly tamer passage.

The Google books version is 1831, a doesn't mention an edition number in Volume II where the quote was found. A volume one at Google books says "A new and revised Edition" and "Third Edition enlarged."

Any idea what 'edition' you had accessed? Can it really be that the book was _that_ revised in the edition I found? All that unseemliness removed? Shenme (talk) 03:25, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for picking up on that typo. I'm afraid don't know which edition it was - I read it in hard copy in the British Library. It evidently went through multiple editions so I'd guess that the one I read was earlier than the online copies that you've found. Prioryman (talk) 12:48, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Privy Garden of the Palace of Whitehall

The article Privy Garden of the Palace of Whitehall you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Privy Garden of the Palace of Whitehall for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Miyagawa -- Miyagawa (talk) 21:21, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Avatici, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Celtic and Pliny. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia library Newspapers.com renewal

Your free one-year account with Newspapers.com will end on March 19 2016. Newspapers.com has offered to extend existing accounts by another year. If you wish to keep your account until March 19 2017, please add your name to the Account Renewal list here. I'll let Newspapers.com customer support know, and they will extend your subscription. If you don't want to keep your account for another year, you don't have to do anything. Your account will expire unless I hear from you that you want to keep it. HazelAB (talk) 17:28, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Four years ago ...

titanic planning and precision
... you were recipient no. 73 of Precious, a prize of QAI!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:26, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

ANI discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Disambiguation link notification for April 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chegutu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chakari. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

DRN opened concerning topic R2-45

DRN has been opened concerning R2-45 naming you as a contesting editor. Grammar's Li'l Helper ^Discourse 22:18, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Arbitration Enforcement Warning

You are in violation of Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Scientology#Purpose_of_Wikipedia and a number of other points in that decision by your editing of R2-45 and failure to collaborate. The terms of that decision will be invoked if you continue in your present course of action. Grammar's Li'l Helper ^Talk 16:56, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Please stop wasting everyone's time with this foolishness. Prioryman (talk) 21:48, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Continued disruption at R2-45

Laval has yet again deleted sourced content from R2-45. There is now a substantial list of Laval's deletions [1] [2] [3] [4] [5][6] plus those deletions by Sfarney [7] [8] [9] [10] . The article has been discussed at ANI once RSN, ANI again, DRN, and ANI a third time. After all that, the behavior still continues. You seem to know Wikipedia best, could you please refer the matter to whomever is the appropriate person or group to deal with the disruption. Feoffer (talk) 03:14, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

L[11][12] "regulars from Tony Ortega's blog comments section contacted me to let me know he hates me with a passion because of the drama that took place on the talk page of the article about him" ."inclusion of ortega's blog posts about people "crippling" scientology not appropriate"

S[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] [23][24][25] [26][27][28][29][30][31][32] Feoffer (talk) 05:53, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Arbitration enforcement

An arbitration enforcement request has been opened concerning your editing of Scientology articles.Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Prioryman Grammar's Li'l Helper ^Talk 07:27, 25 May 2016 (UTC)