Prince1917
April 2021 edit
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Muhammad ibn Musa al-Khwarizmi have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Muhammad ibn Musa al-Khwarizmi was changed by Prince1917 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.8782 on 2021-04-17T02:41:24+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:41, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Goose121. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. It seems that you would like to add the information that al-Khwarizmi was Muslim to the article; however, your edits are removing other information, such as the city where an image is and the fact that he was Persian. Furthermore, this information is already included within the Life section of the article. As such, I have reverted your edit. Goose121 (talk) 03:08, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
Warning edit
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Kansas Bear (talk) 03:19, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
April 2021 edit
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 15:25, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
May 2021 edit
Hello, I'm Paper9oll. I noticed that you recently removed content from Inshallah without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 14:17, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
It’s InshaAllah Prince1917 (talk) 08:36, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Zakariya al-Qazwini, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 16:26, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Islam in Nigeria, you may be blocked from editing. -- Fyrael (talk) 20:20, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
June 2021 edit
Hello, I'm Denisarona. I noticed that you recently removed content from Rashaida people without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Denisarona (talk) 07:50, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello, it is well known here in the peninsula that the Rashaida aren’t from Hawazin so I just corrected some information Prince1917 (talk) 17:41, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
Warning edit
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of Montgisard, you may be blocked from editing. --Kansas Bear (talk) 12:48, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 17:30, 8 June 2021 (UTC)If you use European/American sources then why not use Arabian Muslim sources? Don’t you think “Kansas bear” that this is a ^ bit ^ bias Prince1917 (talk) 17:43, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
Warning edit
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Muhammad al-Bukhari, you may be blocked from editing. --Kansas Bear (talk) 02:10, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Complaint about your removal of 'Persian' from an article edit
Hello Prince1917. Please see a complaint that was filed on my talk page. You can respond there if you wish. EdJohnston (talk) 13:28, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Block edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. - Donald Albury 23:27, 2 August 2021 (UTC)