Primus Sanctus Don Bosco

Welcome, edit summaries

Hello, Don Bosco, and welcome to Wikipedia. Below are a few editing suggestions to make it easier for you and others to collaborate on the encyclopedia. Please preview, consolidate, and summarize your edits:

• Try to consolidate your edits, at least at the section level, to avoid cluttering the page's edit history; this makes it easier for your fellow editors to understand your intentions, and makes it easier for those monitoring activity on the article.
  • The show preview button (beside the "publish changes" button) is helpful for this; use it to view your changes incrementally before finally saving the page once you're satisfied with your edits.
• Please remember to explain each edit with an edit summary (box above the "publish changes" button).

Thanks in advance for considering these suggestions. Eric ^talk 15:00, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Helpful links

Hello again- Here are some links and standard guidance for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style

When you post on talk pages, please sign your name using four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your post; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions or . Eric ^talk 15:04, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

February 2021

Hello, I'm Flori4nK. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Michael Neary (bishop)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. - Flori4nK ^{t • c} 15:40, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Primus Sanctus Don Bosco. I noticed that your recent edit to Michael Neary (bishop) added a link to an image on an external website or on your computer, or to a file name that does not exist on Wikipedia's server. For technical and policy reasons it is not possible to use images from external sources on Wikipedia. Most images you find on the internet are copyrighted and cannot be used on Wikipedia, or their use is subject to certain restrictions. If the image meets Wikipedia's image use policy, consider uploading it to Wikipedia yourself or request that someone else upload it. See the image tutorial to learn about wiki syntax used for images. Thank you. – 108.56.139.120 (talk) 12:29, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Hello- Your editing campaign across many church-related articles is introducing changes that should be discussed with other editors first. Many of your edits introduce awkward style changes and unnecessary terms to longstanding articles. You might consider seeking guidance here: Wikipedia:WikiProject_Catholicism Eric ^talk 13:42, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Dominique Lebrun, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Your edit at Dominique Lebrun and many other articles for Catholic prelates are contrary to the Manual of Style and to guidance at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Catholicism. – 108.56.139.120 (talk) 16:30, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at António Ribeiro. – 108.56.139.120 (talk) 11:23, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Westminster Cathedral. Eric ^talk 13:58, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

You are welcome. I am sorry but I am just beginner editor. Primus Sanctus (talk) 01:56, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Attempt at slowing this editor's campaign

FYI, all, a post I made asking an admin for advice on getting the attention of this user: User_talk:Diannaa#new_user_on_campaign:_User:Primus_Sanctus_Don_Bosco. Eric ^talk 14:28, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Eric, thanks for doing that. I realize that Primus may not be reading these given the technical limitations for mobile/unconfirmed users, but I also opened up a talk page discussion at Talk:Michel_Aupetit#Pre-nominals to discuss Primus' recent edits at Michel_Aupetit. At the very least this shows we are trying to communicate. Primus, if you are reading this, please communicate with your fellow editors. – 108.56.139.120 (talk) 14:50, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Eric, it looks like Primus isn't seeing these messages or ignoring them as their disruptive editing continues. I think ANI may be warranted. What do you think? – 108.56.139.120 (talk) 13:37, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Yes, it might be the only way to get their attention. Eric ^talk 14:01, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — Kralizec! (talk) 14:17, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

I just adding an incomplete Titles and links. Primus Sanctus (talk) 01:49, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

Eric, Kralizec, and Francis Schonken, I am trying to open an SPI at Wikipedia talk:Sockpuppet investigations/Primus Sanctus Don Bosco as this editor has reappeared as Primus Sanctus and is making the same edits at multiple Catholic cathedrals/churces and prelates. Perhaps one of you could approve the SPI edit request I submitted to help kick start it. – 108.56.139.120 (talk) 01:34, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, I commented there. Note: It's a good idea to inform the user concerned of the SPI request. Eric ^talk 03:18, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

You appear to have created your alternative account to evade the 31-hour block noted above, and have then continued to use it after the block on this account expired. While there are legitimate reasons why one may have an alternative account, evading a block is not one of them. This is covered in more detail at WP:SOCK. I have indefinitely blocked your alternative account, and have blocked this one for one week. Instructions for how to appeal it, should you wish to do so, can be found at WP:GAB. If you attempt to evade this block again, your next one is likely to be indefinite. GirthSummit _(blether) 11:14, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)