This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
This issue we are trying a new type of newsletter feature: "Featured editor". This is a chance to learn more about the various editors who contribute to the Video games project as well as the roles they fill. If you enjoyed this new feature and would like to see similar interviews in future issues, please drop us a note at the VG newsletter talk page.
David Fuchs (also known as Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs), is a long time video games editor that has written a large number of the project's Featured articles. He has been ranked high on Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by featured article nominations, and has assisted in reviewing and editing more many. Recently David has begun to assist with image reviews for Featured article candidates, and branched out into other types of articles in addition to video games. He can normally been seen on the project's talk page offering advice and his input on the various discussion taking place there.
What drew you to Wikipedia, and what prompted you to begin editing?
I got involved due in part to (I believe, my memory is fuzzy) finding the site while doing research for Advanced Placement Europen History during high school. My earliest contributions (in December 2005) were creating topics based on what I learned, as well as creating an article for my high school with another friend. I soon became involved with editing topics related to Halo video game franchise, specifically the article on the parasitic Flood.
What got you involved in writing Featured articles?
I think for most editors it's a shiny accomplishment you are striving for, and natural for most editors to try and get an FA. I first nominated an article for FA in 2007, after about a year of inactivity onwiki; it didn't pass as it was poorly written and didn't follow our guidelines for writing about fiction; I also took a couple of tries to get my first video game FA (Halo 2).
What article(s) are you most proud of writing or exemplifies your best work?
I suppose Myst is a sort of accomplishment I can point to; I started work on the article on May 2 2008, when it looked like this, and submitted it to Featured Article Candidates one day later. I think that's some kind of record, but I dunno. In terms of being a good read or something I'm very happy with, however, I'd have to look at my more recent work, specifically Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan and Bone Wars.
How do you pick the articles you work on?
Whatever hits me. There's many articles I haven't gotten around to editing and improving as planned because another article has caught my fancy.
What advice would you give to editors seeking to write quality articles?
In the words of one of my favorite cartoon characters when I was a child, "We must do reeea-search!" Even in video games, online sources don't usually cut it. Even after getting an article to FA, make sure you continually trawl the internet and elsewhere for more information to add to the topic.
Note: This is an abridged version. To read the full interview, click here.
The VG Project Collaboration of the Week is a new effort to improve important video game articles of low quality. Every week, an article is random selected by AnomieBOT from the Stub-, Start-, and C-class categories that are rated either High- or Top-importance. Such topics can offer a reader a good deal of encyclopedic information about video games, but are often too underdeveloped or lacking the proper level of writing and sourcing to accomplish this.
All editors are welcome and encouraged to participate by offering their insights and suggestions. Having a pool of different editors, both old and new, will help maximize improvements to the articles as well as our editing skills.
History
Collaborative efforts have come and gone within the VG project several times before. The first such effort, the "Gaming collaboration of the week", began in October 2004 as a result of the several otherweekly collaborations popping up on Wikipedia. It proved to be quite successful at improving articles to meet Wikipedia's standard at the time, but the effort eventually saw less and less participation. A second effort, the "Improvement Drive", began in August 2005 with the intent of improving articles to FA-quality. However, few nominations and articles were selected. The decline in participation in the collaborations and peer reviews resulted in a third effort. It began in February 2006 as a workshop, but never got off the ground.
Numerous discussions have taken place on at WT:VG to jump start collaborations and improve the process to prevent its decline again. While previous collaborations selected any video game article, most editors felt focus should be on video game topics more encyclopedic in nature—topics that are also generally in poor shape because of lack of attention. A common problem mentioned was that previous nomination processes were lengthy and hindered participation. The current idea to automate the process was brought up by JohnnyMrNinja, which was further discussed to iron out the details.
Current collaboration
The current collaborative efforts began in mid-January 2009, and several articles have been improved by editors. The random choice is intended to minimize the selection process, which allows editors to focus on article improvement. Improvements include better organization of content, massaging and copy editing the prose, removing excess non-free images, and much more. The random choice is also meant to encourage participation from editors of varying interest and help prevent burnout. If the present selection is not to your liking, wait until next week. Editors are encouraged to add Template:Collab-gaming to their watchlist to see which article is selected. Recently selected articles are:
Newsletter delivery by xenobot 00:23, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
ocremix link
Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
I saw you removed my dead link flag for ocremix on Discography of Final Fantasy VI. Is the site still up? Checklinks and I can't get to it and I wouldn't want to tag more links if the site is there. —Ost (talk) 14:45, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Odd, I still can't get to the main ocremix page from here. I'll make sure to leave those links alone. Thanks for taking the time to respond. —Ost (talk) 20:13, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
File:Chocobos mysterious dungeon ost cover.jpg listed for deletion
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The WikiProject Video games Newsletter released its first issue a year ago. The newsletter is meant to help connect editors, keep them up-to-date with the activities of the VG project, and improve the knowledge of our members. We've compiled a list of questions to help gauge the effectiveness of the newsletter's first year.
Answers will be accepted for a three week period following the deliver of the March 2009 issue on Wednesday, April 1, 2009. Just to clarify, this is not an April Fools' Day gag, and we would really appreciate honest criticism. Information obtained from this poll is intend to alter the newsletter for the better. So don't feel you should hold back or give answers similar to everyone else.
The VG Barnstar is an award given to Wikipedians recognized for efforts and contributions to improve and develop video game related articles.
The VG Barnstar is one of many Wikipedia Barnstars designed to be given to editors that have helped further the overall quality of Wikipedia. It was created in February 2006 by Jacoplane—see past discussion for details—and has been given to numerous editors since. Sometimes editors with multiple Barnstars use an alternative way to display them: ribbons.
Barnstars are designed to be given by anyone, so don't be shy as everyone enjoys appreciation. If you have noticed or have been impressed with the work of an editor, feel free to let them know by placing {{subst:Barnstar VG|"message" ~~~~}} on their talk page. The template uses a parameter to include a message expressing the reasons behind the award.
Newsletter delivery by xenobot 16:57, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi there
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Still plugging along with WP:FF, I see. And it looks like it's up to 50 GAs; the vision is coming ever closer to becoming a reality! — Deckiller 23:34, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
Latest comment: 14 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion
I'm going to be doing the GAN shortly for this article. Taking a quick glance at it, there are a few gaps of unsourced material (check the ends of the paragraphs for lack of referencing) which you may want to address. Hopefully tomorrow I can start combing through the article closely for copyediting, MoS, etc. MuZemike 23:16, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
Note that I have not ignored the GAN, yet. Had some RL and non-GA stuff to take care of, first. I just completed sitting down with a copy of the article, making grammar/syntax corrections. I'll make my initial copyedit of the entire article later this evening (I have some business to take care of this afternoon) and then make my assessment of everything else. MuZemike 19:53, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
Placed on hold until corrections can be made. There is plenty of unsourced material still, but I understand that it's a rather large article. MuZemike 21:43, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
Prose is now all good, the only things that still need to be addressed are the unreferenced section and one referencing error that I have noted on the GAN page. Almost there. MuZemike 18:16, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
I realized this article already passed GAN, but I stumbled across a recent GameInformer interview with Uematsu that might be helpful. I was going to use it to add to the Music section of Final Fantasy and figured you could use it to strengthen the main music article as well. Hope it helps. (Guyinblack25talk 15:19, 1 June 2009 (UTC))
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Due to an apparent lack of interest, the WPVG Newsletter will be switching from a monthly publication schedule to a quarterly one. The next issue be delivered on July 1, 2009, and will pertain to the second quarter of the calendar year. If you have any comments regarding this, or suggestions to improve the newsletter, please post at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Newsletter.
—VG Newsletter Contributors
Notice delivery by –xenotalk 15:13, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
GA Sweeps invitation
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello, I hope you are doing well. I am sending you this message since you are a member of the GA WikiProject. I would like to invite you to consider helping with the GA sweeps process. Sweeps helps to ensure that the oldest GAs still meet the criteria, and improve the quality of GAs overall. Unfortunately, last month only two articles were reviewed. This is definitely a low point after our peak at the beginning of the process when 163 articles were reviewed in September 2007. After nearly two years, the running total has just passed the 50% mark. In order to expediate the reviewing, several changes have been made to the process. A new worklist has been created, detailing which articles are left to review. All exempt and previously reviewed articles have already been removed from the list. Instead of reviewing by topic, you can consider picking and choosing whichever articles interest you.
We are always looking for new members to assist with the remaining articles, so if you are interested or know of anybody that can assist, please visit the GA sweeps page. In addition, for every member that reviews 100 articles or has a significant impact on the process, s/he will get an award when they reach that threshold. If only 14 editors achieve this feat starting now, we would be done with Sweeps! Of course, having more people reviewing less articles would be better for all involved, so please consider asking others to help out. Feel free to stop by and only review a few articles, something's better than nothing! Take a look at the list, and see what articles interest you. Let's work to complete Sweeps so that efforts can be fully focused on the backlog at GAN. If you have any questions about the process, reviewing, or need help with a particular article, please contact me or OhanaUnited and we'll be happy to help. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 08:39, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
Music of Chrono Trigger
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Nice work! But why did you remove the Brink of Time cover art? It's clearly discussed in the article; it qualifies for fair use. Kariteh (talk) 16:59, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
CE
Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Yeah. I'm thinking about what to do with it on Wikipedia. It's got a Wired cite, "Escapist magazine", Destructoid, Kotaku, Kombo, and something else (some affiliate of n4g). Nothing big like IGN or Gamespot, though, so I guess I'd never be able to make it an independent article. ZeaLitY[ DREAM - REFLECT ] 05:49, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
And soon, an "official quote" from Square Enix that we've been promised. I'll be gone the next two weeks, though, so maybe someone else will have to undertake article creation, or we'll just wait... ZeaLitY[ DREAM - REFLECT ] 07:32, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
Talkback
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thanks to everyone's dedicated efforts to the GA Sweeps process, a total of 396 articles were swept in May! That more than doubles our most successful month of 163 swept articles in September 2007 (and the 2 articles swept in April)! I plan to be sending out updates at the beginning of each month detailing any changes, updates, or other news until Sweeps are completed. So if you get sick of me, keep reviewing articles so we can be done (and then maybe you'll just occasionally bump into me). We are currently over 60% done with Sweeps, with just over a 1,000 articles left to review. With over 40 members, that averages out to about 24 articles per person. If each member reviews an article a day this month (or several!), we'll be completely finished. I know that may be asking for a lot, but it would allow us to complete Sweeps and allow you to spend more time writing GAs, reviewing GANs, or focusing on other GARs (or whatever else it is you do to improve Wikipedia) as well as finish ahead of the two-year mark coming up in August. I recognize that this can be a difficult process at times and appreciate your tenacity in spending time in ensuring the quality of the older GAs. Feel free to recruit other editors who have reviewed GANs in the past and might be interested in the process. The more editors, the less the workload, and hopefully the faster this will be completed. If you have any questions about reviews or the process let me know and I'll be happy to get back to you. Again, thank you for taking the time to help with the process, I appreciate your efforts! --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 18:13, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion GAR
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thank you for taking care of it, PresN! I much appreciate it. Thanks and thanks again! Geuiwogbil (Talk) 23:11, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
Re:GARs
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Sure, I understand. I was thinking about taking a break on those articles and was going to do a reassesment on the Nintendo DS article. I understand that your concern. GamerPro64 (talk) 20:51, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
Ivalice suggestion
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Looking at File:Ivalice-time.jpg, it looks like it could be recreated as a free image, just a matter of knowing what the text is saying. What do you think/any ideas?--Kung Fu Man (talk) 15:05, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
